IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] RADIUS/(D)TLS port usage (was: Review of draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 10 April 2024 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DDCC14F68D for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVHEWcc_ixmf for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D231DC14EB17 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B773898D; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:53:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uvBB-ipnNbZp; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1415F3898C; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1712778801; bh=1au8/4A5uZ+NR0F4qqDU10ZoY5ecegMcGa4Rsc6HTSw=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ni5tw3RP9O4lz63a8Rjp/6mev/UlHPliwhG2qETPUgMWn+FaXyvcHWjnfOBxWsbSf gsb7l69lGyHuIeg+Gg/y5REFG3D3IDtH5/whjbR+QquivL3Wj6Egqwbx8pmhlZMfFI WFVs/e2MzVFsO99UssL5w93WNldoxtjWQH78VYZpFaIY7KRdvIiD9xxohn4+TYOSy7 CQgF1yTgcqyTwU/RzWDKLUFb9iA1KTVpvISiGifoyrEAqib2JKd0BohhQedchpgDw6 p54k5blu/xKggJcTcA+OZ9+HhbPqB67rw6ObaLmmrwbhqZYuq2ylq01QAts/F+I1re SbP5+gXK5JfVw==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09163D70; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de>
cc: radext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2e70196c-0def-401f-83ed-0eb924cc60eb@dfn.de>
References: <CA9BEA9C-39EF-4764-A0FE-D122413B37F7@deployingradius.com> <18ef8267-474e-49ae-9204-0c6c79d5e50c@dfn.de> <2e70196c-0def-401f-83ed-0eb924cc60eb@dfn.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:53:21 -0400
Message-ID: <9611.1712778801@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/cNDyuQV2_T7rkr3vQgZYauiRxcs>
Subject: Re: [radext] RADIUS/(D)TLS port usage (was: Review of draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:53:28 -0000

Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de> wrote:
    > So basically, for DTLS using 1812/1813 is forbidden, for TLS it is
    > discouraged.

    > My suggestion is to generally forbid using the RADIUS/UDP and RADIUS/TCP
    > ports for RADIUS/(D)TLS, to make it absolutely clear that this is completely
    > different.

okay, I also agree.
So what's the new ports?  Did we already have them?
Do we have to ask for new ones (That's not a big deal, since we aren't asking
for <1024)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email