Re: [Rats] Composite Evidence

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 24 January 2020 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27091200F5 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:22:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZyQnh0Kon_vn for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:22:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A99E120044 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:22:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FC938981; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:22:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FCF60A; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:22:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
cc: "Eric Voit \(evoit\)" <evoit@cisco.com>, "Smith\, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "rats\@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <937DAF5E-CC8D-4552-8E4C-9CF67EC9C640@island-resort.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB2536867559E1A20682A1FC2BA10F0@BYAPR11MB2536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <25403.1579747229@localhost> <BYAPR11MB2536EEF62BD7B1C53EC59659A10F0@BYAPR11MB2536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <85492C6F-E854-448F-9507-BBAC25455392@intel.com> <14896.1579811757@localhost> <B7A7F7E5-EC09-44C4-AE02-C480E6D7F8D9@intel.com> <BYAPR11MB253690686524F2557CEE33FCA10E0@BYAPR11MB2536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <937DAF5E-CC8D-4552-8E4C-9CF67EC9C640@island-resort.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:22:50 -0500
Message-ID: <15597.1579890170@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/8iPb5r80Y7UVGFT_gnxwYpadidY>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Composite Evidence
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:22:53 -0000

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> wrote:
    > Not up to speed on this thread but two comments:

    > - It seems the notion of target environment is important here.
    > - I am interested in implications for EAT submods. Seems you should be
    > able to express this stuff in EAT.

yes, I believe that what we are doing is providing *architectural*
justification for features that are probably already in EAT.

I think that this will help with the eventual security evaluation of the
specification(s), because we will know from this use case scenario what the
threat model is.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-