Re: [Rats] IPR check for draft-ietf-rats-architecture

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 21 September 2022 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B45C14CF17 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 03:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pk8l3i-uap1U for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 03:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C93BC14F745 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 03:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (sulu.imp.fu-berlin.de [160.45.114.22]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1479C1F455; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:19:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1FF471A0133; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:19:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Lena Chaponniere <lguellec@qti.qualcomm.com>
cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <PH0PR02MB85992B3C20E16501D5C9F36BEF4C9@PH0PR02MB8599.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN2P110MB110700AC2C8A6C5DB916DDFDDC4C9@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1394812.1663695639@dooku> <PH0PR02MB85992B3C20E16501D5C9F36BEF4C9@PH0PR02MB8599.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Lena Chaponniere <lguellec@qti.qualcomm.com> message dated "Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:50:36 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:19:09 +0200
Message-ID: <43869.1663755549@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/OYSoS6nFsY9q3QSrS5LwsYcU_jw>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IPR check for draft-ietf-rats-architecture
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:19:19 -0000

Lena Chaponniere <lguellec@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
    > Regarding " I didn't find a related patent ", did you mean that 1) you
    > were unable to locate documents for the patents referenced in the
    > disclosures or 2) you found the documents but you do not think the
    > patents referenced in the disclosures are related to the draft?

I couldn't find any patent referenced by the disclosure.
I tried by the patent number, and by the title.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-