Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-eat-15.txt

Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 02 October 2022 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tho.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB844C1522DB for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pf79OSPVUbni for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 06:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51D9C1522BB for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 06:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id a129so9084349vsc.0 for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 06:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=5IUMkm+6Tq7tL3im6acZMP9+xkSjrW4sFxwSHfYCvIg=; b=qHCp8XzWU2hniLhuZ+V7iIVrZ5KcobrYUW9V8dzWHRhPCLd0awz14/c5IUOm2TI78W rPL6p/l2vQMMlqDmqpVjoRWJbrRDR9oOitlLAreBtUizDWI2fguiRWb+O8s6yuMHrjAV Fxjh0XXYr9LTROOXJpJKiIpx/uQl8zKN6xHg9BwkE9GgfShKL/E/BhCmnyxobDibPtBi KRdna8rRveb02wYMkLe5kt0mtwmwwRkQRS8uCqwIofjboR24QDe91zXr0klgjjJsa4T+ j1BJB4MscT4BAxImYhRBya3AN4XEVHwy9r657me4aI0VdrPltOJxmzZxDv8krRZqWwPI dsVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=5IUMkm+6Tq7tL3im6acZMP9+xkSjrW4sFxwSHfYCvIg=; b=ZJ43sTWry4SicQrT5la85veoGi5X3ufYuUv+914qO0OR7DzQ4ad2nkXsD+XQGxI/K6 01UvRSK0iDkdYclH/IgT7/iZbaI+ngMWLHNP2ufe2n9tsIfqTrPrfE6nbAWcO2LMuFTO DPRcRdhelf2V2zmXnAWLPmcQZyPjbEISeZ3pPU/K/8xK75j9nz9g3b81yqM2FtlqHv5G UxnYmvDc0EuQhzFe0En0WrzawtbRv/YrlX77nobVbvtCBOiE0mTMushl8iQS5UcSYlit f4aGS5aY5j8AlMBoLFW8jrBluA/Ro8PS7mZ3T4gGkQirS0/5mWEaSad7LPKWQvEWScik M6eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf08CPiDmcmDaFiQyh+LdXZGdkntAQICHrFkEOKnO9VUo0oYnklx oYtJxOnA5c2kKtRbxQJgKqWlg6maPLya8jW+QitBOoxSojE8XQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4DhOHgpYZvRWB8VVRB3x2jYDuFA7RRLeL1X94ppOFZrw87bTWeZPYVpeqmzfzhmg30PH3MihLO36Xy8XqbvyM=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e10c:0:b0:3a6:6945:1d20 with SMTP id d12-20020a67e10c000000b003a669451d20mr476516vsl.57.1664717672562; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 06:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166466905854.59321.12818330000633725430@ietfa.amsl.com> <869853.1664709443@dooku> <CAObGJnNwuuMLRhPa9xTW1b-OY19zLcpJqj9dreowPXsxtNJcvA@mail.gmail.com> <996453.1664712342@dooku>
In-Reply-To: <996453.1664712342@dooku>
From: Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 14:34:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAObGJnPtRis6CSq-5krh7RgJrke4dxoWUrfZ-pzM-djH8EMU2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: rats@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/STxF1-Z9-zXvCade5eu7rc4ZdhE>
Subject: Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-eat-15.txt
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 13:34:34 -0000

On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 1:05 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >> The term "socket group" is a CDDL-ism.  I know what it means, but it might be
>     >> confusing to some (pointy haired manager) who don't know what CDDL is.
>     >> It might be worth adding to the terminology section.  I'm not sure here.
>
>     > It should be enough to add "The terminology from [RFC8610] and
>     > [RFC9165] applies." to Section 2.
>
> maybe:
>
> socket group: This is a term from [RFC8610] and [RFC9165], and refers to
>        the technical mechanism by which CDDL is extended.

The thing is EAT made a conscious decision to depend heavily on CDDL
(and CDDLplus, by using .feature to handle JSON and CBOR in one go).
So, it's not just the socket term, it's the whole of CDDL that readers
have to understand, and quite well, if they want to make sense of EAT.

By the way, there's a ton of CBOR diagnostic in the examples, so it's
probably a good idea to include a reference to that too in the
Terminology.

cheers,
-- 
Thomas