IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM

hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net Thu, 14 December 2023 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6DDC14F600 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:05:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99pGj2YydB7F for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB378C14F60A for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:05:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1702559109; x=1703163909; i=hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net; bh=TmanzJL44b7KFbLE3y86BTYBlbzpaVM6fbfyqOA43n0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=R0Ek7Q0Mw474fUP5Ucf0P6Rka4CIR0rnEjx3uKZoEt4oR4Rvn0k0krjRXr/PynTk ZCBHUlu64Q1hHAOKZKKjM5k2vcj1kgFJ53i2b3ycrM/eFULw0j8XGaPpwGrcFdKEq Ny9EO93J2HRM+WdV9g/qPzbqYK1qHqG+05qzgD9Gwa/i/xFn3NJ0UK8GuAtbP44yK cPqzsKz6DmGtHNgQvZu6yX4ciDhoqmhGW4ILlHobqGhyeWDvCqvtHIfC74OcEC4m0 N5jgj8ETzMWq02FNvlGXZ+GwMWzgDDVzCVtRETQnh2OJuZTcMTEi47coX6HtQwFp5 +/7escddPb26WB2jQQ==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from Surface ([185.104.138.31]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MuDXp-1rUJiQ1jfp-00udhH; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:05:09 +0100
From: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net
To: 'Muhammad Usama Sardar' <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>, rats@ietf.org
References: <005701da2e02$6acec900$406c5b00$@gmx.net> <84e6047b-b87b-4053-8e5a-fb2c8347defc@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <84e6047b-b87b-4053-8e5a-fb2c8347defc@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:04:54 +0100
Message-ID: <014a01da2e8e$29c96870$7d5c3950$@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_014B_01DA2E96.8B8DD070"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIypL3ao4eyVP6NJJEK319/7y0r6wE/ZkIpr+3XSJA=
Content-Language: de-at
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:A9ogaZ0scBtE0+IRfC8NTGEp7+P41EIShQ2qk2wtM+kd+JSUsuY 4bzhfE4gsJIxFhqjuCXwpmKfkquiXwNof7VgphRr54yDDFmr1P0q3U/aWbvQjkFeh//Qoc7 nM58VNZlRW9Fxz7gA3UMhCeLKmyTNf40pT2lhBivhbhIdqK1Vrzy/YPk+Gp4trQyi4g+60Q Zo4pAZDZkK6yDDTnaFRqQ==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:SJRgD9U0S9s=;PF8HxHo26w4Jt2zG/aRqc3NxSJJ YZWiOefiV61TJC0VFd4H9cM7BIEaq8uhNqyiO+n5mxTmW9CqToppqVNKVX/KjbCysqGPB2r/T hIjWD0k3pMXJKtrBvN6oAHC879UOK7Mk6n5WaAzYrE+gb+6PQ/zQvaohL+rRNd12dupP/RErv zp+uuueAR7bZnPN/0FWRCOuAYysrjpqV7Hdo5qQ0p4SJ9Rep+gg8oBYQ/XXZXS85UE3Q1FOPn 59EFlPvZej4nr9na34cyMlnAuwP2BLD3dt6n6Rm8+cIo1hWYQZZufUje0iJSUdua8HPV27b9n 1ua62C+7Bso6ZMoxMNFIg7ZeYbURoAkblFpMX+oM67h3NZlPUssLf10z5NZTupWpjsGHy2/e+ RJLh1HezHewtsN6BH3uddafShn8mErJ3p65doTzJ+SfxGxxRp0XrAWMMnvM/atqDXeKFss+IJ ZHW5ZZKGAHmdNCwILJF7A5AQ1v5hm0KJ4wpr9oV2rlwAqIIoGrqjtjftId8BbfhmQf9gabMAM 2ri2jCbuMDmFBIlBhc63LyCsh5R9PbTFV/v+w+A56r48/A51gD/HSkdLR+xMPXME+bLv0sB7p wzAHv++0M7mO/OPPsfqeCHHC5+2kmrmMahTxP4k+vixhiEix7AsIzbSMq453XmWCyUpgNgrcv +F+kgyWjzXXkGa2rQ9jw/E94GZ2xBcA9OpKAK0RQPjiQXYrkwkS5r0zg5BhtMswMdHlkepRqi UKVwwfTMZQEZcVmTZcrJ42uTmZiWz8cW3NtKE8m7auCu7Jn43CupTHsEvmX6OeWaDKzn8rjQQ k7tzZcs7u14in0Z345WNgXN4LHL6CoRJNjsieJGL396Ws5JGFfU0abJ/RAcOP64HeCR83k5nS yhnGecC5Au6nMuR6qqLAidPPpfiRobJxkUXuTXcVlIkFx/o0bYVTJS5CW8XkT8ecXGyz18aNV C1AraADI+Fe4BubhyuccI5fW2pI=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/c85EJlv9Y8tAji8T_i3zlc08G_U>
Subject: Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:05:36 -0000

Hi Usama,

 

The introduction of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-concise-ta-stores/ gave me the impression that trust anchors are reference values. Please read it too, maybe I am misinterpreting it.

 

Following the response from Yogesh, I believe the text needs to be improved.

 

Ciao

Hannes

 

 

From: RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Muhammad Usama Sardar
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2023 09:21
To: rats@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM

 

Hi Hannes,

On 13.12.23 21:24, hannes.tschofenig=40gmx.net@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:hannes.tschofenig=40gmx.net@dmarc.ietf.org>  wrote:

I am wondering why the two documents <draft-ietf-rats-corim> and <draft-ietf-rats-concise-ta-stores> aren’t merged. Reading through the RATS drafts I often get the impression that trust anchors have somehow been forgotten and were added later, as an afterthought. The RATS architecture RFC does not list trust anchors as an item in Figure 1. In some other document trust anchors are then portrait as belonging to reference values – somehow. That does not feel right to me either.

I think it is completely wrong to consider trust anchors as Reference Values. Can you name the document which presents this view? 

 

Ciao

Hannes

Cheers,

Usama

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email