IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Thu, 14 December 2023 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343B2C14F60A for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:05:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ww9uVZu7GAV4 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E6FC14EB19 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:05:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5Ju0hqsFRPnv4U82S6/8hmJzxWnH4sQCvzy4UV08GmA=; b=u2gZbsxcY+LnptRnFoIIBUcMIe nczVpexrfrRfNFdSUIOpsqKb+zIfJ9p5bU1RzcsQEWfkzQ7vZEY05OzFL6gc+hz9EibnTGaVVJnN+ ma4lc94XKtbzHMStyyVHtNlPi95zoMbMc46VuT4+sNO1V5v43Hwo480/4JlBQncOCtCH0nufpvP3o Yc4PqG/gam0q3xyBT0HB2U8fjvtPIsef6F8hmMeZ35NzWgobbZWIRre5RQByzoQFrhY/E51f6b4Hz cpm00NS4CK7Hk6R1q/KINQW5VzJAB/taHyCty23Q/Npu61HOAtIKS5lxu+/B5sjNRZ0Ht1Y1cQWz7 8fOUfDqw==;
Received: from [172.26.35.114] (helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1rDmKk-00Gy4R-O7; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:05:03 +0100
Received: from [10.70.3.25] (194.95.143.137) by MSX-T314.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:04:59 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------e4E7ie90PPhfcN8vFi6oaxf6"
Message-ID: <335966e2-8f1f-4dc9-abf8-ab0f7c27cc1e@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:04:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net, rats@ietf.org
References: <005701da2e02$6acec900$406c5b00$@gmx.net> <84e6047b-b87b-4053-8e5a-fb2c8347defc@tu-dresden.de> <014a01da2e8e$29c96870$7d5c3950$@gmx.net>
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <014a01da2e8e$29c96870$7d5c3950$@gmx.net>
X-ClientProxiedBy: msx-l321.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.121) To MSX-T314.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.114)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/vJnGwsOm976wG4MHCzR74YP9T6o>
Subject: Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:05:09 -0000

Hi Hannes,

I agree that the CoTS introduction (namely the second paragraph) gives a 
wrong impression and needs to be presented more precisely.

Cheers,

Usama

On 14.12.23 14:04, hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net wrote:
>
> Hi Usama,
>
> The introduction of 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-concise-ta-stores/ 
> gave me the impression that trust anchors are reference values. Please 
> read it too, maybe I am misinterpreting it.
>
> Following the response from Yogesh, I believe the text needs to be 
> improved.
>
> Ciao
>
> Hannes
>
> *From:*RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Muhammad Usama Sardar
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2023 09:21
> *To:* rats@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Rats] CoTS and CoRIM
>
> Hi Hannes,
>
> On 13.12.23 21:24, hannes.tschofenig=40gmx.net@dmarc.ietf.org wrote:
>
>     I am wondering why the two documents <draft-ietf-rats-corim> and
>     <draft-ietf-rats-concise-ta-stores> aren’t merged. Reading through
>     the RATS drafts I often get the impression that trust anchors have
>     somehow been forgotten and were added later, as an afterthought.
>     The RATS architecture RFC does not list trust anchors as an item
>     in Figure 1. In some other document trust anchors are then
>     portrait as belonging to reference values – somehow. That does not
>     feel right to me either.
>
> I think it is completely wrong to consider trust anchors as Reference 
> Values. Can you name the document which presents this view?
>
>     Ciao
>
>     Hannes
>
> Cheers,
>
> Usama
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email