RE: [Raven] Congressman Bob Barr thanks IETF for not doing the wi retap thang

Ed Stone <estone@synernet.com> Sat, 05 February 2000 01:58 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA15091 for <raven-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:58:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA22916; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:47:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA22887 for <raven@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:47:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fast.synernet.com (IDENT:root@fast.synernet.net [166.82.6.2] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14956 for <raven@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:49:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from computername (a793c.vnet.net [166.82.194.182]) by fast.synernet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10661 for <raven@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:48:45 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000204204612.009b4ac0@fast.synernet.com>
X-Sender: estone@fast.synernet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 20:49:21 -0500
To: raven@ietf.org
From: Ed Stone <estone@synernet.com>
Subject: RE: [Raven] Congressman Bob Barr thanks IETF for not doing the wi retap thang
In-Reply-To: <200002041223.HAA23033@ietf.org>
References: <E39024226822D311BC880008C77318A1AF5161@oteis01nok>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: raven-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: raven-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Raven Discussion List <raven.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: raven@ietf.org

At 07:23 AM 2/4/2000 , you wrote:
>On 3 Feb 00, at 16:57, Melinda.Shore@nokia.com wrote:
>
> > > But he has been very good on privacy issues, as anyone who
> > > has followed his legislative and privacy record knows.
> >
> > Unless Bob Barr doesn't approve of your sex life, in
> > which case he believes that you do not have the right
> > to engage in consensual acts with another adult in
> > your own home.  He also thinks that giving his own
> > religious beliefs the force of law is a dandy thing to
> > do, which is also (arguably) a privacy issue.
>
>So he clearly isn't "very good on privacy issues".


Ah the old consenting adults in the privacy of their home line.....

A simple puncture of that follows: Persons A and B, both adults iving in 
the same home consent to an arrangement in which A shoots B in the head in 
front of a camera in return for $500,000 paid to a person B designates. 
This is 1) consenting 2) adults 3) in their home. Next juvenile attempt?

--
--------------------------
Ed Stone
estone@synernet.com
--------------------------

_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven