Re: [regext] "Considerations" Sections

On 11/7/18 8:43 AM, John Levine wrote:
> Looks like I missed an exciting session.
> 
> In article <CAAQiQRcdF0bft2BznsYxHOJDVX+_0SuFV_JtpXy3B7a49shVdQ@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>> b) There is zero mention of the benefits that may come of this with
>> regard to keeping criminals from using the domain infrastructure. For
>> example, freedom from harassment seems like it would be a human right

If we can make the link to this, I think we should document this in the considerations.

> 
> Yes, that is in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human
> Rights.  I've pointed out more than once in HRPC sessions that there
> are a lot more rights than the handful they like to think about.
> 

I invited you to suggest additions to draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines so we can add those considerations. I still think that would be very useful.

> I see no reason to add a human rights section to this specification,
> and certainly nothing like the language they've proposed.

As Gurshabad said, no language has been proposed thusfar.

Happy to discuss!

Best,

Niels

> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Researcher and PhD Candidate
Datactive Research Group
University of Amsterdam

PGP fingerprint	   2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488  
                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3