IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] "Considerations" Sections

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F095128D68 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:43:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=TTlPwI/J; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=vsf0TCxw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ucvef1B6Ici8 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1C4128CE4 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 93779 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2018 07:43:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=16e4d.5be2978c.k1811; bh=Z+0rwuxdruaM7WBR+eYTv+58+NHTGrfkjASx2RGtJMM=; b=TTlPwI/JWRXfR8pbPfXSSDNpfPeH+SZfZ9vqfixk4UcjmxsdW84Z32RHxS0RGev4WS2K8dkZRGcuUqiYXGzeyuZVEFPhQGHfX5k8dJ4Dpw/wSKIE31RT5suGqwpSXrXpdJTs3fETRC4sPyNvuquWslAtdnONoFv89yzz6I9Lbz1XuhrsLPkiaNKm2lhF66nujXx4N7vrp5iX6dlMaLog4hmzA6RdHyiWwiskiTdIlTyUencB8VlS2RmDluqHjv9S
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=16e4d.5be2978c.k1811; bh=Z+0rwuxdruaM7WBR+eYTv+58+NHTGrfkjASx2RGtJMM=; b=vsf0TCxwGNJK91ewtgC8MHD0eeaASJdTcKjOxQvU5nXYMwsq7OKY+GneQOIPei9r3ssOZCDg40wrNc/aEW5Io9/78NS6iiiWjlyRXlRgrjWPvnKH350ECWJ7jGkyFe8JwBhboDUaABMaZMm+RabLaMW59BNrIGYLFyimo9BZ40dr233q4qrsTjgazl+rrAyRyOXKCJK+lBqU7bV5itdVRzBMf6I5S8bEWrkScyb6xwXvMld8JQ80rPnYpCOl9RR4
Received: from dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 07 Nov 2018 07:43:08 -0000
Received: by dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 653D720080139D; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:43:07 +0700 (+07)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:43:07 +0700
Message-Id: <20181107074307.653D720080139D@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Cc: andy@hxr.us
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRcdF0bft2BznsYxHOJDVX+_0SuFV_JtpXy3B7a49shVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/UTPw4H3U73eob5gi7Hp3kDwVjg0>
Subject: Re: [regext] "Considerations" Sections
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:43:11 -0000

Looks like I missed an exciting session.

In article <CAAQiQRcdF0bft2BznsYxHOJDVX+_0SuFV_JtpXy3B7a49shVdQ@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>b) There is zero mention of the benefits that may come of this with
>regard to keeping criminals from using the domain infrastructure. For
>example, freedom from harassment seems like it would be a human right

Yes, that is in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights.  I've pointed out more than once in HRPC sessions that there
are a lot more rights than the handful they like to think about.

I see no reason to add a human rights section to this specification,
and certainly nothing like the language they've proposed.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email