IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] "Considerations" Sections

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BA128A5C for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7UK-BAE9T1Z for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail5.verisign.com (mail5.verisign.com [69.58.187.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B4012007C for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:01:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=802; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1541491302; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=eG03G7CeQ7/ECg/o1JQWLWrWe1YN7uBF6RuBaP5tkYQ=; b=KJgwmTErUmpIbwiU6DwSR+nacegq95DDOUsbKg1QlqquBEcCefjLA9no jDnfWtwDvZ6ALO5UaFOecV7m5sQpwEcoGYhGNVZ6QAA1jxHU7Zoubv8cq 7CQM3c+KDPo6VBLYPHq9eTBRb7OJFVUcYvptld30x0kA1HUh6Xch9eNlG B4ojkO1f6zEqxGPVWxljNoseqz75tm5H+Z38rFQfJwhylNNzzAaadOt0w fhxX6w+xPfphPig2Td2XucbPWKuA5Gdq4fDqHgv5Z21sHd6wvibbU0wYq FZ2iEnlnvx8SQsZGgFAUCim82mYdj4eGcfii6bOTC0121NTS3A8R5EHj6 w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,471,1534824000"; d="scan'208";a="6159588"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IPAS-Result: A2EzAAD4SOFb/zGZrQpkHQEBBQEHBQGBUQgBCwGEG4wEkVeTfYF6DAETiFY0DQ0BAwEBAQEBAQIBAQKBEYI2IoMkUQE+QiYBBBuvQ4U8hHeMDYFCPoERjWsCnzMDBgKRByCQYJciAgQCBAUCFIFDgg5wgz2QWI17gR8BAQ
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1531.3; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 03:01:40 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde%4]) with mapi id 15.01.1531.003; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 03:01:40 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'regext@ietf.org'" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: "Considerations" Sections
Thread-Index: AdR1pJYa381rKIFaRxukr3d3vLHxXA==
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 08:01:40 +0000
Message-ID: <d250d4aa2e284ab1bc4fdc770770d2d1@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/ZOf7V_Td3TQa2tnzMek5CwaOgkU>
Subject: [regext] "Considerations" Sections
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 08:01:44 -0000

Following up on the in-room discussion regarding Human Rights Protocol Considerations as compared to Security Considerations and other types of considerations that appear in IETF documents:

I mentioned at the mic that we don't have any documents representing IETF consensus that provide guidance for writing human rights protocol considerations. It was mentioned that RFC 8280 describes such guidelines. True, it does, but it's an Informational document that "represents the consensus of the Human Rights Protocol Considerations Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force". RFCs 3552 (Security Considerations) and 8126 (IANA Considerations) are, in comparison, IETF BCPs. So, I'll stand by my comment regarding the lack of _IETF_ consensus on the topic.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email