[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

[James Galvin <[e-mail]>]

As co-Chair, I was giving this document and discussion a quick review before closing the WGLC and handing over to the Document Shepherd and I noticed what I believe is an editorial point.


Speaking as a working group participant, SAC125 offers a complementary analysis about sacrificial nameservers as currently appears in Section 5.  How do you feel about adding a single sentence to the introduction to Section 5, something like the following:


For a broader consideration of the practice and its potential impact on both registries and registrars, “SAC125: SSAC Report on Registrar Nameserver Management” offers some complementary insight (https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/security-and-stability-advisory-committee-ssac-reports/sac-125-09-05-2024-en.pdf)


If you agree and agree it’s just an editorial nit, I’m comfortable letting it get sorted with the Document Shepherd after the WGLC closes and before submission to the IESG.

Of course, if anyone else has an opinion or comment please do jump in.

Thanks,

Jim


On 2 Jul 2024, at 15:29, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Galvin <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 9:27 AM
>> To: REGEXT Working Group <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
>>
>> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>>
>> The Chairs have decided to extend this WGLC last call for two weeks, one more
>> week from the date of this message.  There has only been on indication of
>> support and two different threads discussing some minor changes.  We would
>> like these discussion to resolve and for there to be more indications of support
>> for this document.
>>
>> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this
>> document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient).
>>
>> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of this
>> document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of business
>> everywhere, Monday, 1 July 2024.
>
> [SAH] Good to go now?
>
> Scott