IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Using RDAP as a Domain Availability Service

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Fri, 16 December 2016 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA61129F37 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:37:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjsKbF8aeBSY for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:37:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x22a.google.com (mail-wj0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBABA12A139 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id xy5so89988981wjc.0 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:34:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9kjIdbX9R8f5/V6noX7Z6f44H4ne8gYiEo85nL0AnMs=; b=gs7p0ER5AhS0+XKRLximut47yRKi/qPJdqjHoEjSY3uZD8rP+y71++4mCXdryjLSPj tW1cCJBVQO+JHG6D1N5BpGT4wu1NA2olq2Zykk7PeDQKheRz6WJhiC7OO3bYyVU+ATP7 GYOTSdvNONNa3T3KWDZdV1CgTXwI3x/o6OVF3gLCLjrj8UayecDAgI3oEI3morJf4bVI Z9/uI8ed0VvM4MDMcVtDbkyXKgk+aLQmGJ/S9F7QJKlJsMP66ck+BqMaP87BLIND8Mr2 vtpiduvaqPQ1DDy0UmrbIXL7FwC6Q5eW0gXL5bohZUz0jNqeeG09q8IbAzvyIyn3Shsn vHbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9kjIdbX9R8f5/V6noX7Z6f44H4ne8gYiEo85nL0AnMs=; b=htC2SzhjhQo7Yy8/19auaZzKCJRgfHIwilGPeGUDfxA979DOuxGjmWVnxZ4B90sw0j h7s/UrvvZ/Vcuv7C9zAXPVcbVoMyxhyca4tm5dLPqLLDS9nMghUSRCRWrT9qxyJGJIDI u/u7Sa2EjWTzaSrIiBpHK5zOYiy6ysC8bhLZIXd+oMoilNQVt1ejbNmrSWTL+jIDox5w PxLMUYvWzBP1S5eK5xdR/BxoOdYFc9BkX9KfuBABk68k2ywcKgzytGyQQK3vjXe2dIr3 M2pCqQskLtLp3mRszoiRo1zDGKqxgk8UqnMuQQq+sKmZs5i2cA3xYsGUfFyHRf8k/KU6 asng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00lrg7z4wURiyTaxzqVd2oKr4nw1ic5YCbMqbG9DH7em+YNPXNWP+cRmkllxOJFsG/D6+J7LWQyP5N6Lg==
X-Received: by 10.194.107.97 with SMTP id hb1mr2263919wjb.134.1481888082021; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:34:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.171.9 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:34:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [108.48.59.58]
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 06:34:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRcH6d23hT5aFYUve1LC+NhijpHwOvW+26G5wJw=gHoUuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/j4hRUfeZzb_YPWtX8In7ll43MF8>
Subject: [regext] Using RDAP as a Domain Availability Service
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:37:42 -0000

This topic keeps appearing over and over again, so Marcos and I
decided to address it.
As it turns out, there's not much needed to achieve this. This draft
suggests two new query parameters and re-uses the current RDAP domain
query. In other words, its a very small addition to RDAP.

-andy


A new version of I-D, draft-newton-regext-rdap-domain-availability-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Andrew Lee Newton and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-newton-regext-rdap-domain-availability
Revision: 00
Title: Using RDAP as a Domain Availability Service
Document date: 2016-12-16
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 6
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-newton-regext-rdap-domain-availability-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-regext-rdap-domain-availability/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-newton-regext-rdap-domain-availability-00


Abstract:
  This document describes a minimal profile of RDAP which can be used
  to check the availability of domain names available for registration.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email