Re: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires

[Alexander Mayrhofer <[e-mail]>]

Question – particularly regarding the Fee draft (but, might apply to other drafts as well):


-          This is (still) an individual draft, and I have not seen a call for adoption to make it a WG document

-          However, during the session, it was indicated that this document would go to “Last Call” soon

-          If this was meant to be a Working Group Last Call, then I don’t see how an individual draft could be subjected to that.

Therefore, are we going to see a call for WG adoption for said document? Or, is there a plan for a different path to publication?

Thanks,
Alex

Von: regext [mailto:[e-mail]] Im Auftrag von Ulrich Wisser
Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. April 2016 21:24
An: Hollenbeck, Scott; [e-mail]
Betreff: Re: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires

Scott, you got it. I now copied Barrys name from the ietf website. And I inserted your text for the ipr.

WG, please find the updated version below.



REGEXT meeting at IETF 95 Buenos Aires 2016-04-04 17:40-19:40

Co-chair James Galvin in the room
Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho

Jabber scribe:  Marco Davids
Minutes: Ulrich Wisser

Barry Leiba gets a beer as leaving area director. Thank you for all your work!

Note well on screen

2 Existing Documents
2.a En route to publication

draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
Verisign is still working on an appropriate declaration update. Scott expressed hope that an update could be provided within a few weeks.

draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
approved by IESG in the RFC Editor queue

2.b EPPEXT WG leftovers

draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
One change pending
depends on draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
enter last call on mailing list
shepherd: Ulrich Wisser

draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
Francisco presenting in the room
enter last call on mailinglist
shepherd: Ulrich Wisser

2.c REGEXT WG new documents
No comments from room

3. Registry Fee extension draft-brown-epp-fees
Gavin Brown presents remotely
Gavin asks wg for comments on the three options for defining check syntax.
James Gould remotely comments on signaling unavailability.
Scott Hollenbeck (in the room) Option B
From jabber: James Gould option C, Alexander Mayerhofer Option B
Gavin Brown indicates B as preference
Chair suggest new version and discussion on the list + possibly move to last call

4. Reseller extension draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
Presented in room by Linlin Zhou
Jabber: No need for org field
WG asked for guidance on status values
Question: Do we need reseller if we do not have registrar object?
More discussion on mailing list needed

5. RDAP Nameserver objects and Registrar Expiration date

draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date
Francisco presents in the room
James Gould/ Alexander Mayerhofer: Do not use login to define server behavior
Scott: Why do we need another expire date, maybe rename it
Antoin: We do not need draft if ICANN changes policy (which is still in discussion)
WG: More objection to login sync option
James Galvin: Do not like login sync option
James Galvin: Maybe premature ICANN not decided on policy
Status: Not wg work item just yet only tech discussion

draft-lozano-rdap-nameservers-sharing-name
RDAP extensions
Allow two name server objects with same host name but different ROID
Revised document required, after that asking for adoption

6. Federated Authentication for RDAP using OpenID
Presented by Scott Hollenbeck in room
No discussion in room

7. 3rd Party DNS operator to Registrars/Registries Protocol draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol
Presented in room by Ólafur Guðmundsson
Asking wg for adoption

8. Verification Extension for EPP Contact/Domain Name Mapping
draft-zhou-eppext-contact-verification
draft-wang-eppext-domain-verification
Presentation in room by Linlin Zhou
Not asking for adoption yet


James Galvin concludes the meeting


Hollenbeck, Scott <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> schrieb am Di., 5. Apr. 2016 um 20:48 Uhr:
Ulrich, minor corrections below.

Scott

From: regext [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of Ulrich Wisser
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:37 PM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires

Hi folks!

Here are the minutes. I hope I got all the names right.

/Ulrich


REGEXT meeting at IETF 95 Buenos Aires 2016-04-04 17:40-19:40

Co-chair James Galvin in the room
Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho

Jabber scribe:  Marco Davids
Minutes: Ulrich Wisser

Barry Laiba gets a bottle of beer as leaving area director. Thank you for all your work!
s/Laiba/Lieba/

Note well on screen

2 Existing Documents

2.a En route to publication

draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
Scott gives update on IPR status - no update, no information from Verisign yet
[SAH] Could we please change this to read: “Verisign is still working on an appropriate declaration update. Scott expressed hope that an update could be provided within a few weeks.”.

draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
approved by IESG in the RFC Editor queue

2.b EPPEXT WG leftovers

draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
One change pending
depends on draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
enter last call on mailing list
shepherd: Ulrich Wisser

draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
Francisco presenting in the room
enter last call on mailinglist
shepherd: Ulrich Wisser

2.c REGEXT WG new documents
No comments from room

3. Registry Fee extension draft-brown-epp-fees
Gavin Brown presents remotely
Gavin asks wg for comments on the three options for defining check syntax.
James Gould remotely comments on signaling unavailability.
Scott Hollenbeck (in the room) Option B
From jabber: James Gould option C, Alexander Mayerhofer Option B
Gavin Brown indicates B as preference
Chair suggest new version and discussion on the list + possibly move to last call

4. Reseller extension draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
Presented in room by Linlin Zhou
Jabber: No need for org field
WG asked for guidance on status values
Question: Do we need reseller if we do not have registrar object?
More discussion on mailing list needed

5. RDAP Nameserver objects and Registrar Expiration date

draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date
Francisco presents in the room
James Gould/ Alexander Mayerhofer: Do not use login to define server behavior
Scott: Why do we need another expire date, maybe rename it
Antoin: We do not need draft if ICANN changes policy (which is still in discussion)
WG: More objection to login sync option
James Galvin: Do not like login sync option
James Galvin: Maybe premature ICANN not decided on policy
Status: Not wg work item just yet only tech discussion

draft-lozano-rdap-nameservers-sharing-name
RDAP extensions
Allow two name server objects with same host name but different ROID
Revised document required, after that asking for adoption

6. Federated Authentication for RDAP using OpenID
Presented by Scott Hollenbeck in room
No discussion in room

7. 3rd Party DNS operator to Registrars/Registries Protocol draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol
Presented in room by Ólafur Guðmundsson
Asking wg for adoption

8. Verification Extension for EPP Contact/Domain Name Mapping
draft-zhou-eppext-contact-verification
draft-wang-eppext-domain-verification
Presentation in room by Linlin Zhou
Not asking for adoption yet


James Galvin concludes the meeting




--
Ulrich Wisser
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
--
Ulrich Wisser
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>