Re: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires

As Antoin said, we had agreed at the last meeting that we would move to 
have the draft’s renamed to more directly reflect that they are a 
working group document.

I have since learned that this is not strictly necessary.  The documents 
are listed in the charter and when the working group adopted the charter 
it thus adopted the documents.

We could change the names but it’s not strictly required.  For 
documents for which we are providing an update before we submit to the 
IESG, it would be a convenient time to change the name and perhaps we 
should do that.  I’ll reach out to authors and we’ll make that 
happen.

Jim

On 6 Apr 2016, at 3:28, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

> Question – particularly regarding the Fee draft (but, might apply to 
> other drafts as well):
>
>
> -          This is (still) an individual draft, and I have not seen a 
> call for adoption to make it a WG document
>
> -          However, during the session, it was indicated that this 
> document would go to “Last Call” soon
>
> -          If this was meant to be a Working Group Last Call, then I 
> don’t see how an individual draft could be subjected to that.
>
> Therefore, are we going to see a call for WG adoption for said 
> document? Or, is there a plan for a different path to publication?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Von: regext [mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Ulrich 
> Wisser
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. April 2016 21:24
> An: Hollenbeck, Scott; regext@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires
>
> Scott, you got it. I now copied Barrys name from the ietf website. And 
> I inserted your text for the ipr.
>
> WG, please find the updated version below.
>
>
>
> REGEXT meeting at IETF 95 Buenos Aires 2016-04-04 17:40-19:40
>
> Co-chair James Galvin in the room
> Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho
>
> Jabber scribe:  Marco Davids
> Minutes: Ulrich Wisser
>
> Barry Leiba gets a beer as leaving area director. Thank you for all 
> your work!
>
> Note well on screen
>
> 2 Existing Documents
> 2.a En route to publication
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
> Verisign is still working on an appropriate declaration update. Scott 
> expressed hope that an update could be provided within a few weeks.
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
> approved by IESG in the RFC Editor queue
>
> 2.b EPPEXT WG leftovers
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
> One change pending
> depends on draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
> enter last call on mailing list
> shepherd: Ulrich Wisser
>
> draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
> Francisco presenting in the room
> enter last call on mailinglist
> shepherd: Ulrich Wisser
>
> 2.c REGEXT WG new documents
> No comments from room
>
> 3. Registry Fee extension draft-brown-epp-fees
> Gavin Brown presents remotely
> Gavin asks wg for comments on the three options for defining check 
> syntax.
> James Gould remotely comments on signaling unavailability.
> Scott Hollenbeck (in the room) Option B
> From jabber: James Gould option C, Alexander Mayerhofer Option B
> Gavin Brown indicates B as preference
> Chair suggest new version and discussion on the list + possibly move 
> to last call
>
> 4. Reseller extension draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
> Presented in room by Linlin Zhou
> Jabber: No need for org field
> WG asked for guidance on status values
> Question: Do we need reseller if we do not have registrar object?
> More discussion on mailing list needed
>
> 5. RDAP Nameserver objects and Registrar Expiration date
>
> draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date
> Francisco presents in the room
> James Gould/ Alexander Mayerhofer: Do not use login to define server 
> behavior
> Scott: Why do we need another expire date, maybe rename it
> Antoin: We do not need draft if ICANN changes policy (which is still 
> in discussion)
> WG: More objection to login sync option
> James Galvin: Do not like login sync option
> James Galvin: Maybe premature ICANN not decided on policy
> Status: Not wg work item just yet only tech discussion
>
> draft-lozano-rdap-nameservers-sharing-name
> RDAP extensions
> Allow two name server objects with same host name but different ROID
> Revised document required, after that asking for adoption
>
> 6. Federated Authentication for RDAP using OpenID
> Presented by Scott Hollenbeck in room
> No discussion in room
>
> 7. 3rd Party DNS operator to Registrars/Registries Protocol 
> draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol
> Presented in room by Ólafur Guðmundsson
> Asking wg for adoption
>
> 8. Verification Extension for EPP Contact/Domain Name Mapping
> draft-zhou-eppext-contact-verification
> draft-wang-eppext-domain-verification
> Presentation in room by Linlin Zhou
> Not asking for adoption yet
>
>
> James Galvin concludes the meeting
>
>
> Hollenbeck, Scott 
> <shollenbeck@verisign.com<mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com>> schrieb am 
> Di., 5. Apr. 2016 um 20:48 Uhr:
> Ulrich, minor corrections below.
>
> Scott
>
> From: regext 
> [mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org>] On 
> Behalf Of Ulrich Wisser
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:37 PM
> To: regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> Subject: [regext] Minutes for meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires
>
> Hi folks!
>
> Here are the minutes. I hope I got all the names right.
>
> /Ulrich
>
>
> REGEXT meeting at IETF 95 Buenos Aires 2016-04-04 17:40-19:40
>
> Co-chair James Galvin in the room
> Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho
>
> Jabber scribe:  Marco Davids
> Minutes: Ulrich Wisser
>
> Barry Laiba gets a bottle of beer as leaving area director. Thank you 
> for all your work!
> s/Laiba/Lieba/
>
> Note well on screen
>
> 2 Existing Documents
>
> 2.a En route to publication
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
> Scott gives update on IPR status - no update, no information from 
> Verisign yet
> [SAH] Could we please change this to read: “Verisign is still 
> working on an appropriate declaration update. Scott expressed hope 
> that an update could be provided within a few weeks.”.
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
> approved by IESG in the RFC Editor queue
>
> 2.b EPPEXT WG leftovers
>
> draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
> One change pending
> depends on draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
> enter last call on mailing list
> shepherd: Ulrich Wisser
>
> draft-eppext-tmch-func-spec
> Francisco presenting in the room
> enter last call on mailinglist
> shepherd: Ulrich Wisser
>
> 2.c REGEXT WG new documents
> No comments from room
>
> 3. Registry Fee extension draft-brown-epp-fees
> Gavin Brown presents remotely
> Gavin asks wg for comments on the three options for defining check 
> syntax.
> James Gould remotely comments on signaling unavailability.
> Scott Hollenbeck (in the room) Option B
> From jabber: James Gould option C, Alexander Mayerhofer Option B
> Gavin Brown indicates B as preference
> Chair suggest new version and discussion on the list + possibly move 
> to last call
>
> 4. Reseller extension draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
> Presented in room by Linlin Zhou
> Jabber: No need for org field
> WG asked for guidance on status values
> Question: Do we need reseller if we do not have registrar object?
> More discussion on mailing list needed
>
> 5. RDAP Nameserver objects and Registrar Expiration date
>
> draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date
> Francisco presents in the room
> James Gould/ Alexander Mayerhofer: Do not use login to define server 
> behavior
> Scott: Why do we need another expire date, maybe rename it
> Antoin: We do not need draft if ICANN changes policy (which is still 
> in discussion)
> WG: More objection to login sync option
> James Galvin: Do not like login sync option
> James Galvin: Maybe premature ICANN not decided on policy
> Status: Not wg work item just yet only tech discussion
>
> draft-lozano-rdap-nameservers-sharing-name
> RDAP extensions
> Allow two name server objects with same host name but different ROID
> Revised document required, after that asking for adoption
>
> 6. Federated Authentication for RDAP using OpenID
> Presented by Scott Hollenbeck in room
> No discussion in room
>
> 7. 3rd Party DNS operator to Registrars/Registries Protocol 
> draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol
> Presented in room by Ólafur Guðmundsson
> Asking wg for adoption
>
> 8. Verification Extension for EPP Contact/Domain Name Mapping
> draft-zhou-eppext-contact-verification
> draft-wang-eppext-domain-verification
> Presentation in room by Linlin Zhou
> Not asking for adoption yet
>
>
> James Galvin concludes the meeting
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ulrich Wisser
> ulrich@wisser.se<mailto:ulrich@wisser.se>
> --
> Ulrich Wisser
> ulrich@wisser.se<mailto:ulrich@wisser.se>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext