IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 21 January 2020 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DD9F40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:56:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C1qW8shwnm4s for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244E2F406AF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p548DC4D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.196.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 482Hnk4Vdhz10pj; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:56:42 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1d18f689-781a-2306-3c98-ae8536a01bdd@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:56:42 +0100
Cc: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 601325801.975016-6df5a8fc21bedce22ae37ac041d3f806
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A124261-BB8B-41A6-A374-BD7BC8B61FB3@tzi.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiXhhJO7qYi41+DC4W7uMUVipXqyq75Fq2vagA1ppJNdA@mail.gmail.com> <10cca93f-a8b8-4c42-0653-3b12fa67ad12@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgA-1UffBfrH-Y3J6pfh7ni9kNrndp=gHNyUyi5j=oLxg@mail.gmail.com> <53607da4-6608-783b-b875-65551e3add19@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgNU2Dr3bB+A8k+UwbQiRRzgUkoRRh60tc6+bBv6CXwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <70ed6362-41ee-faf5-8f90-d094455dbdf4@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwhy-AV_K5evzGdpDi-ynpLE4RxXCVB1HercickYfZaubg@mail.gmail.com> <e8bc039a-b85f-61e8-966d-912ec1cfd861@gmail.com> <1d18f689-781a-2306-3c98-ae8536a01bdd@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:56:41 -0000

On 2020-01-21, at 19:42, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> There was a mailing list (rfc-design), and yes, it was preserved. But it
> wasn't public, so the archives aren't either.

That explains a lot.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email