Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A9129C6B for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClcM-_bqj_Ha for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD131295CD for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39303B80FE6; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C78BB80FE6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McISQLCQ30bl for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0027CB80F54 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 68894 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2017 20:28:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Feb 2017 20:28:21 -0000
Date: 9 Feb 2017 20:27:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20170209202759.20043.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <782376ec-3b4e-9bbd-e2c0-18c60b3ea20b@gmx.de>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: julian.reschke@gmx.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

>FWIW, setting up stable URIs might be as easy as editing the Apache config.

Making the stable URIs work is likely a few lines of mod_rewrite.  The harder
part is making sure that the relevant people know that those URIs have to
keep working the next time someone works on the errata.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest