[rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter) Fri, 11 July 2014 20:07 UTC
From: "brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com"
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:07:55 +1200
Subject: [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics
In-Reply-To: <1405105687.14446.553.camel@mightyatom>
References: <1405105687.14446.553.camel@mightyatom>
Message-ID: <53C0441B.40509@gmail.com>
On 12/07/2014 07:08, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi. > > I understand the reasoning behind deprecating the (absolute) height and > width attributes for artwork, but is it always reasonable to require > SVG, etc. to be rendered at actual size as specified during creation? > Should there be provision for a scaling factor in the (v3) vocabulary? I can't parse "actual size". Scaling to fit the screen/window/paper size is a given, isn't it? The only question is whether the author needs any control over it. Brian
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Elwyn Davies
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Joe Touch
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Joe Touch
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics "Martin J. Dürst"
- [rfc-i] Scaling factors for graphics Larry Masinter