Re: [rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-rpc-rfc7322bis-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 03 May 2023 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0523C151980 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2023 16:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCUkB6Xu6PAP for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2023 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08950C151527 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 3 May 2023 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1aae5c2423dso50391785ad.3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 03 May 2023 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683158155; x=1685750155; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6vpg0eccGqnf+E4/Bsp2JbQyO4v/t7UEvIQL0nYAy2g=; b=S0KOPjh+5pAqQy9/hhIEGn2oxwCCdiQRj9qNTy863I+GvvlXW3NIBXGo+6OK79PdJz 61UOZiqmzm0rNvjmu22UhLwc3vUFrUlBxbqcJAoXdInkSxEakXmZPF7AaOhZPnVrwANO 64DfWpi/qmyr9CRXDxpOpaHMIca3YbWuaMu9hQfjMYcUa2F8dFkiUYBIIUxUe20TjwJs aQpk8nT1n/lU/amGC9JLFPbGJ2Fe3+Pj7bLURDzERRYyQCTklxEHRsEiiuTUO4nlfzbZ MCMhS59DBl6LtPZaAkhXRSQM/wppD+QiyeH5O84CtUHU+AA9XGtLTJHomKLS+TQ1mf8G /pDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683158155; x=1685750155; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6vpg0eccGqnf+E4/Bsp2JbQyO4v/t7UEvIQL0nYAy2g=; b=ASb4Ib0T1lSclbtVN8xVtKNqSKa/7440eJPZulxYT2j/CGS35RQEyRYJAzcAss3mIE 4i9NYaIBPijTophwNoZ7CM56gvAzGdyEOrtTDdzd3G89yuKa0hyspZAjaMXL2N99pcUA GsrEqbg1eu+TJT9GKQmmDHzAnoIznXS8w7HMksD9t3/4VSEpvBKCMhI1JhIb0PHWETHb iwe3v8ZCh2Z47OCzBlABcyXir+8+7NSxhwVQwFmjxHh79hAPUD7AGjcxt4lQUuz4fnsY zBdKYL161WE9Y1/3+fPgVpzW6eCqIt/sXrpeVMLEfg/i4qKbj8ag5H1VB7xqPDOtx9Mm j2Tw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxVXj7nIA1P3TQcx0JRJhXQZF3HJr1UjWRoTl2cLO9oPfWHYCgE mjAArzxPBFeuoRvc2+RtciEMJAfccymxDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5pEVg1YYbFiwXM2/wQpvEmSUqKRm1TUE/LVuga37QJ1xYTORLX375FVTl6QpRycVCNr/EFaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb8e:b0:1a1:f95a:24f2 with SMTP id m14-20020a170902bb8e00b001a1f95a24f2mr1461095pls.19.1683158155113; Wed, 03 May 2023 16:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:1184:f001:9991:d1ad:8c20:42bd? ([2406:e003:1184:f001:9991:d1ad:8c20:42bd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4-20020a170902cec400b001a814fcbd7dsm1667195plg.185.2023.05.03.16.55.53 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2023 16:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <03b8e483-e737-d97c-ceb2-2d326e0609b3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 11:55:49 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <168298351605.49415.8898708942774388283@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <168298351605.49415.8898708942774388283@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/BLucQ5QZ2cdNiTW_QQEZ4Z8McMo>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-rpc-rfc7322bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 23:56:00 -0000

Hi,

I seem to be missing something. This is a -00 draft but it has a change log for versions through 05. What should we be comparing this with?

Also, it would be useful to have a "Changes since RFC7322" section.

Regards
    Brian Carpenter

On 02-May-23 11:25, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> 
>     Title           : RFC Style Guide
>     Authors         : Sandy Ginoza
>                       Jean Mahoney
>                       Alice Russo
>     Filename        : draft-rpc-rfc7322bis-00.txt
>     Pages           : 29
>     Date            : 2023-05-01
> 
> Abstract:
>     This document describes the fundamental and unique style conventions
>     and editorial policies currently in use for the RFC Series.  It
>     captures the RFC Editor's basic requirements and offers guidance
>     regarding the style and structure of an RFC.  Additional guidance is
>     captured on a website that reflects the experimental nature of that
>     guidance and prepares it for future inclusion in the RFC Style Guide.
>     This document obsoletes RFC 7322, "RFC Style Guide".
> 
>     Note: This draft is being developed and discussed in the GitHub repo
>     <https://github.com/rfc-editor/draft-rpc-rfc7322bis>, but any
>     substantive change should be discussed on <rfc-interest@rfc-
>     interest.org>.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpc-rfc7322bis/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rpc-rfc7322bis-00.html
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt