IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 27 November 2020 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE91D3A07DF; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6LloeHXV5id; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CC23A047D; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0ARGQlwg013770; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:47 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CF92203C; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0315522032; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([195.166.134.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0ARGQjvZ016044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:46 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Eliot Lear' <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, rfced-future@iab.org
References: <4A34B713-E013-4A36-9296-694F07EC5AC5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A34B713-E013-4A36-9296-694F07EC5AC5@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:44 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <04e901d6c4da$192afa90$4b80efb0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQK2WJxmIEQv+FUkp3uHd370w58a+qgc/19A
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 195.166.134.111
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25816.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.611-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.611-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25816.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.611200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 8+bhjh9TQnFq0U6EhO9EEyEyJ8xFEVolkW0zU11KKK3aOIP2b6ZfX70s A/cGYry6py+dwKxMjsDRa+XTiZwbMtBo81ST2NRRGUlF/M3Dxp+mJtY0iSfJ/bV5fSMRD1zqhGz G3wY/cLdt7em2i8cWux8iOqc8ylAx/8TykoC75C35WZT2GFh+neAeEI3tbHhVWsKKuc6vT6z5ih 3vHFgxg/5Z91GSApBaRCVxhki+AcMsMLcUZMcjdzlRhU08NvGHQfblIp3oBdEutoY2UtFqGGK3y skfEbaLo/mqMFSx4F7DAp66YwIpWLkWDqm7WNaJOQ2HvvZCJ0wX705dnYk+LFMnnsDzMI/0Xv0U vr1nqBcl17aQoQXxXF+24nCsUSFN/fTpDjOELgPdB/CxWTRRuwihQpoXbuXFHfUkXbq09y/LyZ7 6YXOLqaB5TxsKqEn2Hw7b3CJb0nnf2qL85ahrlo/iqdL4ttHpVrfA5PRTp0+YafFZowXWnu5Ret YWKft1kc8vZYcPwmShurVaY1hyX4xdVwkeE3a3UyOqrFz2uoieqD9WtJkSIw==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/70LZqhaxLSZpdJCLhZuQM_0wiV8>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:26:51 -0000

Hi Eliot,

Happy Black Friday.

I found this just a tiny bit ambiguous. I think that, in the context of the subject line, I can work it out. So, to be clear...

• The chairs think that there is likely rough consensus that role of the chair and the RS[EA] should be split.

• The chairs think we have consensus that the RS[EA] can raise issues to the strategic group

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the RS[EA] does not make strategic decisions but that those are decided by the strategic body

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the RS[EA] does not direct the RPC/REP.

Right?

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Rfced-future <rfced-future-bounces@iab.org> On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
Sent: 27 November 2020 15:37
To: rfced-future@iab.org
Subject: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **

As mentioned in the minutes:

Please let us know if you disagree with any of the following:


• The chairs think that there is likely rough consensus that role of the chair and the RS[EA] should be split.

• The chairs think we have consensus that that person can raise issues to the strategic group

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the person does not make strategic decisions but that those are decided by the strategic body

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the person does not direct the RPC/REP.


This does not resolve all of issue 12, of course.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email