Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 27 November 2020 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877773A0E70 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:28:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JE7sBfkKeATn for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213293A0E6F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C14E300ADB for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:28:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id dSYJpLQ65ikZ for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:28:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1307300670; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:28:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <AADEFD92-5873-4D0E-A798-1C31328FF8BC@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:28:03 -0500
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AC18655A-7C12-4A89-B50A-B97ECC104080@vigilsec.com>
References: <4A34B713-E013-4A36-9296-694F07EC5AC5@cisco.com> <04e901d6c4da$192afa90$4b80efb0$@olddog.co.uk> <AADEFD92-5873-4D0E-A798-1C31328FF8BC@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/VX0w2hzJSwzHsoU0GyZQ5xrciL0>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:28:08 -0000

Eliot:

Without knowing who makes the consensus calls for a "strategic body", I cannot agree to anything you have said about that body.


> • The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the RS[EA] does not direct the RPC/REP.

I think that there is rough consensus that the IETF LLC holds the contract for the RPC and RFC Publisher, and both of these may reach out to the RS[EA] for advice.

Not clear whether you meant that or not.

Russ