IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Suggested text for issues #56, #57, #61, #62

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 24 August 2021 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56063A0FC9 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vp5v296vuHrL for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052DC3A102C for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1815:5480:b768:b865]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A832600370; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:33:39 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629808419; bh=3TOLZVawuHDzC0yLxXqYGHNVG9cYqtMg7eoZ1W70RIQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=A+Da9j/qgDbeSo9lSIGrCXy3ozET4eXXDr3jdyJgaUI3Fx+27+wFb9ryYOBeFtYZA c6PMAUWgW6742Y1yVS2mhOPeMpaOyLipdTC0Zty/QZMgWI5wl4ky+bcak2F3gz/V55 oWFgkoqkn/2ilf/B4ku0NG0URiMc6HUR8RiuHc5w=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <5E519E19-58BC-4ED6-A110-2D0B8B585827@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A8A1C625-2C66-4306-82E4-8F5C17A18B3A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:33:37 +0300
In-Reply-To: <f587a45c-14be-3495-01a0-858a2b4b7bb2@lear.ch>
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
References: <C6116522-4988-4ED5-BCA7-9B36D701B99A@kuehlewind.net> <2B46402F-5268-46B7-890F-7C5CA159EF13@ietf.org> <25FCCF71-ED00-48CA-8A15-4BB63B632F73@kuehlewind.net> <f587a45c-14be-3495-01a0-858a2b4b7bb2@lear.ch>
X-MailScanner-ID: 1A832600370.A2B8C
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/jDebXixhOEeHL8XrcLIqyR61Egw>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Suggested text for issues #56, #57, #61, #62
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:34:05 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-8-24, at 15:29, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
> I have, perhaps poorly, attempted to piece together what I think is roughly what we're all talking about.  I may have entirely gotten this wrong, and so please nitpick.  There is one sentence in brackets that I think is redundant.  I have not really touched the relationship text.
> 
> Eliot
> 
> # Roles and Processes

<snip>

this would work for me, with or without the sentence in brackets.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email