Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Pascal,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Nice! I love it Spencer : )
>
>
>
> I suggest a slight adaptation to show that with the current specs, the
> device is the endpoint for the tunnel and the destination of inner packet
> as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>        ------+---------                           ^
>
>              |          Internet                  |
>
>              |                                    | Native IPv6
>
>           +-----+                                 |
>
>           |     | Border Router (RPL Root)      + | +
>
>           |     |                               | | |
>
>           +-----+                               | | | tunneled
>
>              |                                  | | | using
>
>        o    o   o    o                          | | | IPv6-in-
>
>    o o   o  o   o  o  o o   o                   | | | IPv6 and
>
>   o  o o  o o    o   o   o  o  o                | | | RPL SRH
>
>   o   o    o  o     o  o    o  o  o             | | |
>
> o  o   o  o   o         o   o o                | | |
>
> o          o             o     o               + v +
>
>                    LLN
>
>
>
>
>
> Works ?
>

I knew you could fix the stuff I got wrong :D ...

Works for me!


> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* mercredi 26 octobre 2016 16:26
> *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* The IESG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Alvaro Retana
> (aretana) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; draft-ietf-roll-routing-
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03:
> (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> Hi, Pascal,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick response. Inline.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hello Spencer,
>
> The 2 shorter arrows, left and right, represent the encapsulation tunnel.
>
>
>
> Now that you've said that, I totally get it, but I didn't get that from
> the picture at all.
>
>
>
> Would you have a suggestion to improve the readability?
>
>
>
> Maybe :-)
>
>
>
> I lengthened the native IPv6 arrow and used different endpoints for the
> tunnel, hyphenated "IPv6-in-IPv6, and included "tunneled using" in the
> label (I probably didn't use the right words, but you'd know what is
> correct).
>
>
>
>        ------+---------                           ^
>
>              |          Internet                  |
>
>              |                                    | Native IPv6
>
>           +-----+                                 |
>
>           |     | Border Router (RPL Root)      + | +
>
>           |     |                               | | |
>
>           +-----+                               | | | tunneled
>
>              |                                  | | | using
>
>        o    o   o    o                          | | | IPv6-in-
>
>    o o   o  o   o  o  o o   o                   | | | IPv6 and
>
>   o  o o  o o    o   o   o  o  o                | | | RPL SRH
>
>   o   o    o  o     o  o    o  o  o             | | |
>
>  o  o   o  o   o         o   o o                + | +
>
>  o          o             o     o                 |
>
>                    LLN                            v
>
>
>
> If this helps you folks, please use it (and if it doesn't, please don't!)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Spencer the AD, where "A" may or may not stand for "ASCII-artist" ...
>
>
>
> Take care,
>
> Pascal
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: mercredi 26 octobre 2016 05:40
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; Alvaro Retana (aretana) <
> [e-mail]>; Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In figure 2, I'm a bit confused on what the third-from-the-left vertical
> line represents - is it also IPv6 in IPv6 plus RPL SRH, or something else?
>
>
>