Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9844E129408; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E_3oHIuUMpOe; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22e.google.com (mail-yb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F1712950B; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f97so2256929ybi.1; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pPm+YuZizp8sNymWs2XIf6kduO+ch30wevZDkZWTLwE=; b=oQ2QfeQcV09XkV/yFDECi0TC/BdPHqgphyJ5s/SHniKvQZcRqE0Ul9Iv1WtlgupZTg 9sUVdAE67ne7SqW72fDJr+X+j1Iv2LVHI5S/0hfTMfrb8F3eNcrSYCO4lz9yMtfzjaQW kUe+WHlKPb6/fIHOJKwf4V+VM8uDG0ISLBbDf7ozSHf+8/bkldMBXz29jeSuL1f0xaBs Cw4qPbZGawvNJmkJDbNUH9/NFbPCzMmTbNUI8Kplj+02d8u8At8ZYsYZjzadEdcOCKzl ztjq9I4hXLrQo8PD9sS+0CpfzIeyLwLU4BJCHc/7nsozbPKH07TaSJHhzLgG1qExdg7l lRPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pPm+YuZizp8sNymWs2XIf6kduO+ch30wevZDkZWTLwE=; b=hxrjyEsu6g48WgFEcP5vZVqYODWAGKYcDpSt6gL7FPNf0RWzDkQbrxf5DoJvJuZxeW a1EAaX+A+jBvbKqraCzyy1pia7bOBM8jjDhdig8+4XDa0wScTUKSU5yxukchhqTdqELg PrUowLdrj06Tz8MjkQwMYMUED2czFe17o2rACMOhDzeR5A7+PVkcQjGDmq6g8tEXlNC8 VeZkHdOzGNricjoK3UK5hD4JmobnSmWqPI0/BHZRf9T3JfXtCtksVpC8iOx8sJgRsjds Krn9FaHstCIKxA2sjTv8gx6upyDkNN79K7jaSKjW5CQk/wKromL+TsuXBil4J+XjLcfS DqLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvedhrORuGJ5X8PgofgKFlXV0JUO/mdgGJsnmq7svKowX0hxxTdQA02KcKBMzt61vN/xwyr9g+oOCWDsbA==
X-Received: by 10.37.24.11 with SMTP id 11mr580969yby.198.1477491932836; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.36.16 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8fe34e2a63e448998b90177140876d41@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <147745319246.29259.2342833266178316799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8fe34e2a63e448998b90177140876d41@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:25:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fKrTF9u7V7sOMmw77gy9Oi3vpy-d9oW+4L2EZ5g+APTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fc4b4d0e74a053fc565b8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/vZ2mze86roIcdwsNLQTjG0tXT0M>
Cc: "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:25:38 -0000

Hi, Pascal,

Thanks for the quick response. Inline.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello Spencer,
>
> The 2 shorter arrows, left and right, represent the encapsulation tunnel.
>

Now that you've said that, I totally get it, but I didn't get that from the
picture at all.


> Would you have a suggestion to improve the readability?


Maybe :-)

I lengthened the native IPv6 arrow and used different endpoints for the
tunnel, hyphenated "IPv6-in-IPv6, and included "tunneled using" in the
label (I probably didn't use the right words, but you'd know what is
correct).

       ------+---------                           ^
             |          Internet                  |
             |                                    | Native IPv6
          +-----+                                 |
          |     | Border Router (RPL Root)      + | +
          |     |                               | | |
          +-----+                               | | | tunneled
             |                                  | | | using
       o    o   o    o                          | | | IPv6-in-
   o o   o  o   o  o  o o   o                   | | | IPv6 and
  o  o o  o o    o   o   o  o  o                | | | RPL SRH
  o   o    o  o     o  o    o  o  o             | | |
 o  o   o  o   o         o   o o                + | +
 o          o             o     o                 |
                   LLN                            v

If this helps you folks, please use it (and if it doesn't, please don't!)

Thanks,

Spencer the AD, where "A" may or may not stand for "ASCII-artist" ...


> Take care,
>
> Pascal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com]
> Sent: mercredi 26 octobre 2016 05:40
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana (aretana) <
> aretana@cisco.com>; Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>;
> roll-chairs@ietf.org; mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca; roll@ietf.org
> Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In figure 2, I'm a bit confused on what the third-from-the-left vertical
> line represents - is it also IPv6 in IPv6 plus RPL SRH, or something else?
>
>
>