Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204141294D8; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnvZFj7Ra47o; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA83129449; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2082; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477474636; x=1478684236; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Jglyg9YH2BtzPhIS741XbELX7gO3CkANJe8UOvuqS8k=; b=BRPJWUNOO3L6+de+zX4N/gp46cJPDfSAumoewLxKwMC6KbleLxp6ZNWD 9SOKwtsqR/hm9Lyakah41N0vzRd9pwkCbVg5x5fvAAmJWo/kPCfpE8Zm+ T/UnaR3SRFX4Jwn6BpaucHpStwbV2XRz7axXjc5SgKl7ZN2dXCD1T4wY5 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CEAQCUeBBY/4gNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR1YfQeNLpZ+h16KUoIPggknhXsCGoFkPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRiAQEBBCMRRQwEAgEIEQQBAQMCIwMCAgIfERQBCAgCBAENBQiIMgMXDrM4iHYNg3ABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEHhTaEVYJHgVIRAYMgglsFiEWRHDUBhiuGUYMcgXWEbYkpiHCEGoQAAR42XoNNgTpyAYY8gSCBCQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,550,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="163903030"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Oct 2016 09:37:15 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9Q9bF4V032078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:37:15 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:37:14 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:37:14 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSLzqeOoO/tkqjTU+qTev4BssAsKC6VEtA
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:37:09 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:36:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8fe34e2a63e448998b90177140876d41@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <147745319246.29259.2342833266178316799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147745319246.29259.2342833266178316799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.104.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Jc6_QGUkXPKuIyhrxNerggxvdzs>
Cc: "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org>, "mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:37:18 -0000

Hello Spencer,

The 2 shorter arrows, left and right, represent the encapsulation tunnel. 
Would you have a suggestion to improve the readability?

Take care,

Pascal

-----Original Message-----
From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: mercredi 26 octobre 2016 05:40
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>; Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>; roll-chairs@ietf.org; mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca; roll@ietf.org
Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In figure 2, I'm a bit confused on what the third-from-the-left vertical line represents - is it also IPv6 in IPv6 plus RPL SRH, or something else?