Re: [Roll] RPL Status
"Anders Brandt" <abr@sdesigns.dk> Wed, 19 May 2010 07:45 UTC
Return-Path: <abr@sdesigns.dk>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743E43A6BF0 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2010 00:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.475, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMYxM6ki-QX6 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2010 00:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.zen-sys.com (mail.zen-sys.com [195.215.56.170]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56453A6C21 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAF726.72DDA7EA"
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:39:44 +0200
Message-ID: <6D9687E95918C04A8B30A7D6DA805A3E0142A175@zensys17.zensys.local>
In-Reply-To: <D77B6BCD-BB54-4CA9-B532-C0C89E900215@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPL Status
Thread-Index: Acr2bzqPWxPN57CbQt+h7yszz74kKgAti/sw
References: <D77B6BCD-BB54-4CA9-B532-C0C89E900215@cisco.com>
From: Anders Brandt <abr@sdesigns.dk>
To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>, roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL Status
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:45:17 -0000
All, >the plan is still to Last Call RPL before the next IETF I would like to poll the WG on this statement. The home and building requirements are not met by the current RPL draft and we have not even started discussing the P2P ID mechanisms in detail - or frame format modifications for that matter. Does the WG agree that a RPL spec without support for home and building applications is acceptable? Thanks, Anders ________________________________ From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:48 To: roll WG Subject: [Roll] RPL Status Dear WG, Here is a quick status. First, we would like to thank the WG again for the continuous effort and lots of fruitful and productive work ! As discussed in Anaheim, the plan is still to Last Call RPL before the next IETF. The plan is to release the next revision of the RPL I-D by end of next week. Rev-08 will address the following: 1) Security section (integrating the work on the security DT) 2) New DAO mechanism (cleaner and more simple), as agreed on the Mailing List 3) Basic source routing => See also companion drafts to be published very soon for (RH-0 like) 4) Updated manageability section 5) DAO ACK 6) Trickle algorithm removed from the core specification (in a separate doc), Examples removed 7) Several Edits, clarifications, ... I had a discussion with David, and the plan is to have the P2P a separate ID (the current RPL specification provides basic P2P, with "advanced" P2P defined in that I-D), with the objective to progress both documents in parallel. What else ? We need to progress a few other documents: 1) Use of the RPL TLV: see draft-hui-6man-rpl-option (6man WG) 2) Source routing header (RH-0 like): to be published soon (Jonathan/David) 3) RPL Variables (ticket #22) 4) ID related to measurement from P2P (if consensus on Mailing list) Looking forward to your comments as soon as rev-08 will be published. Thanks. JP and David.
- [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Anders Brandt
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Anders Brandt
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Samita Chakrabarti
- [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-07 Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu