Re: [Roll] RPL Status

Le 19/05/2010 09:39, Anders Brandt a écrit :
> All,
>  >the plan is still to Last Call RPL before the next IETF
> I would like to poll the WG on this statement.
> The home and building requirements are not met by the current RPL draft
> and we have not even started discussing the P2P ID mechanisms in detail -
> or frame format modifications for that matter.
> Does the WG agree that a RPL spec without support for home and building
> applications is acceptable?

Only in part because of the failure to meet requirements - I disagree to 
pursue RPL towards LC before the next IETF: it is way too early.

We have wide technical misunderstandings about the scope of this 
protocol and its applicability.

Alex

> Thanks,
> Anders
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] *On
>     Behalf Of *JP Vasseur
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:48
>     *To:* roll WG
>     *Subject:* [Roll] RPL Status
>
>     Dear WG,
>
>     Here is a quick status. First, we would like to thank the WG again
>     for the continuous effort and lots of fruitful and productive work !
>     As discussed in Anaheim, the plan is still to Last Call RPL before
>     the next IETF. The plan is to release the next revision of the RPL
>     I-D by end of next week. Rev-08 will address the following:
>
>     1) Security section (integrating the work on the security DT)
>     2) New DAO mechanism (cleaner and more simple), as agreed on the
>     Mailing List
>     3) Basic source routing => See also companion drafts to be published
>     very soon for (RH-0 like)
>     4) Updated manageability section
>     5) DAO ACK
>     6) Trickle algorithm removed from the core specification (in a
>     separate doc), Examples removed
>     7) Several Edits, clarifications, ...
>
>     I had a discussion with David, and the plan is to have the P2P a
>     separate ID (the current RPL specification provides basic P2P, with
>     "advanced" P2P defined in that I-D), with the objective to progress
>     both documents in parallel.
>
>     */What else ?/*
>     We need to progress a few other documents:
>     1) Use of the RPL TLV: see draft-hui-6man-rpl-option (6man WG)
>     2) Source routing header (RH-0 like): to be published soon
>     (Jonathan/David)
>     3) RPL Variables (ticket #22)
>     4) ID related to measurement from P2P (if consensus on Mailing list)
>
>     Looking forward to your comments as soon as rev-08 will be published.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     JP and David.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll