Re: [Roll] RPL Status
"Anders Brandt" <abr@sdesigns.dk> Tue, 18 May 2010 10:12 UTC
Return-Path: <abr@sdesigns.dk>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E013A6782 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.547, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EJgLz0Twrt2 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.zen-sys.com (mail.zen-sys.com [195.215.56.170]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30823A6914 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAF672.886ECD1E"
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:50 +0200
Message-ID: <6D9687E95918C04A8B30A7D6DA805A3E0142A168@zensys17.zensys.local>
In-Reply-To: <D77B6BCD-BB54-4CA9-B532-C0C89E900215@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPL Status
Thread-Index: Acr2bzqPWxPN57CbQt+h7yszz74kKgAAyU0A
References: <D77B6BCD-BB54-4CA9-B532-C0C89E900215@cisco.com>
From: Anders Brandt <abr@sdesigns.dk>
To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>, roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL Status
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:12:01 -0000
hi JP ________________________________ From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:48 To: roll WG Subject: [Roll] RPL Status Dear WG, Here is a quick status. First, we would like to thank the WG again for the continuous effort and lots of fruitful and productive work ! As discussed in Anaheim, the plan is still to Last Call RPL before the next IETF. The plan is to release the next revision of the RPL I-D by end of next week. Rev-08 will address the following: 1) Security section (integrating the work on the security DT) 2) New DAO mechanism (cleaner and more simple), as agreed on the Mailing List 3) Basic source routing => See also companion drafts to be published very soon for (RH-0 like) 4) Updated manageability section 5) DAO ACK 6) Trickle algorithm removed from the core specification (in a separate doc), Examples removed 7) Several Edits, clarifications, ... I had a discussion with David, and the plan is to have the P2P a separate ID (the current RPL specification provides basic P2P, with "advanced" P2P defined in that I-D), with the objective to progress both documents in parallel. May I suggest: (the current RPL specification provides rudimentary P2P, with the required and sufficient P2P defined in that I-D) ;-) What else ? We need to progress a few other documents: 1) Use of the RPL TLV: see draft-hui-6man-rpl-option (6man WG) 2) Source routing header (RH-0 like): to be published soon (Jonathan/David) 3) RPL Variables (ticket #22) 4) ID related to measurement from P2P (if consensus on Mailing list) Looking forward to your comments as soon as rev-08 will be published. Thanks. JP and David.
- [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Anders Brandt
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Anders Brandt
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] RPL multicast (was Re: RPL Status) JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Samita Chakrabarti
- [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-07 Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] RPL Status Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] whither draft-ietf-roll-protocols-surv… Alexandru Petrescu