IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Alvaro's review on turnon Rfc 8138 07

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 07 July 2020 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FC33A0B82; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kdlt794Ps5hC; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C293A0B80; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53686389A6; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sE0lWZukTHc7; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E35389A5; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D895C5; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:32:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
cc: "roll-ads@ietf.org" <roll-ads@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MAXPR01MB249302F0AEF0BE51120D35D6A9660@MAXPR01MB2493.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <MN2PR11MB35657CEB09EA8FB7F1BF8391D8690@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <23854.1594056180@localhost>, <MN2PR11MB3565BD10D7AF55F662300F01D8660@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <MAXPR01MB249302F0AEF0BE51120D35D6A9660@MAXPR01MB2493.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:32:46 -0400
Message-ID: <25892.1594121566@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ebUUyvIAx8nzUaT1z0op0-pJOxM>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Alvaro's review on turnon Rfc 8138 07
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:32:50 -0000

Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> wrote:
    >  The problem with these additional fields is that they will be
    >  redundant once we have capabilities.

    > I feel we do not need to handle the case of "forgotten nodes".

This.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email