Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25

Hello again,

I went over the changes and your comments and I left comments directly 
in github.

TL;DR: All good on my side, thanks a lot.

Best,
Aris

On 03/06/2022 19:32, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
>
> Hello Aris:
>
> Many thanks again!!!
>
> I pulled your proposed changes and then addressed the comments 
> answering inline. So it you look at
>
> https://github.com/roll-wg/dao-projection/commit/fcb1e78dfec8bcddd11b75ecf7d81cb30452b6f2
>
> you will find my answers next to your comments, and you’ll observe the 
> proposed changes I made.
>
> I published the result to the datatracker so you can observe the diffs 
> as well. Note that you your point on missing SRG column, the SRH is 
> the same as the VIO (in NSM) so it was already there 😊
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-26.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-26
>
> Please let us know if we are good. If we are, all the WGLC comments 
> I’m aware of are now resolved.
>
> Keep safe;
>
> Pascal
>
> *From:* Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis <aris@ariskou.com>
> *Sent:* vendredi 3 juin 2022 4:08
> *To:* roll@ietf.org
> *Cc:* draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have just submitted two pull requests (#17 and #18) in relation to 
> my review of this draft. They should show  up in github.
>
> The first (#17) contains a set of typos and expressions which I fixed 
> as part of reading the draft. It was easier for me directly modify the 
> file and commit it. You should be able to easily pick and choose what 
> to keep, of course.
>
> The second (#18) contains comments on different parts of the draft, 
> and should be self-explanatory.
>
> Overall, the draft, while extensive, is reasonably understandable. 
> Some parts which are not initially clear did clear up by the end of 
> reading it, so no complaints here.
>
> I also proposed some aesthetic improvements to aid in comprehension.
>
> Overall, from my point of view its in a very good state and quite mature.
>
> I await any questions or feedback on the specifics.
>
> Best,
> Aris
>
> On 03/05/2022 17:26, Ines Robles wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     We have not received inputs on this.
>
>     We really need reviews, please consider volunteering for that. If
>     you have any interest but need more time, please let us know
>
>     Thank you very much,
>
>     Ines and Dominique
>
>     On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ines Robles
>     <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) starts today (08th April)
>         until 29th April for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25.
>
>
>         The draft is available here:
>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/
>
>
>         Please review this draft to see if you think that it is ready
>         for publication and send your comments to the list stating
>         your view.
>
>
>         Thank you very much in advance,
>
>         Ines and Dominique.
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Roll mailing list
>
>     Roll@ietf.org
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>