Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25

Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis <aris@ariskou.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <aris@ariskou.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E1CC14F693; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailfence.com header.b=GXsT2x0J; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ariskou.com header.b=IJWXHGZl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHweMKehz4Cd; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.contactoffice.com (wilbur.contactoffice.com [212.3.242.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6ED1C14F736; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth2.co-bxl (smtpauth2.co-bxl [10.2.0.24]) by wilbur.contactoffice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D11A35; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:12:34 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailfence.com; s=20160819-nLV10XS2; t=1654283554; bh=erY7YJYfHknVFKC44C9inOXDkik3phmpHi7CbFaM870=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=GXsT2x0JD+kPinMUSNgfMt7Lnp1tirGcerLvZ9hKqn12SfqK1nWIN1E9oWIKje0fX zHZV1c+GpBVzl6eAEafclSfCKfdXCU4XAn/jVMV4NBqbJZ1rN+Ncbn6tX9NPO+Fzbi CaMFN4r5s2B6FI4IQZuPyTK5u7lmdTVQJ4tzlBMXYp3mwpUrgXrPzbNWrQWbYTkGxh kxeL+2eAd7CcUfowybp+FRiHSv89WMZhka5MGjYj3rjZm3NGv9Wm5hGwugeHAP7PEi vG4Mi51V5yugJWhEgE06TrCs/dx0XZPaCgqyStcHMKXw6nM13wPPWtScz0IwyhGrV5 dK7hkiFaoSiug==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1654283554; s=20191001-wvim; d=ariskou.com; i=aris@ariskou.com; h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; l=17219; bh=erY7YJYfHknVFKC44C9inOXDkik3phmpHi7CbFaM870=; b=IJWXHGZlDBzZmeUGhwyxpwNaJ2p2ECVxEqlSBPDBcOekmk5l6XPcC3DbhI1kSK4L P78A29LShfbi2PBqE/bYrvH4M6jP9QUVPNe3ivMUhoH+C2Nt3sqfHI4KY3omjMBilbM XKvl/TnIcbVKEJxtnf6yx+FbUSe3Jr88n2TWPemP1Q1g1ph9Fs88dvgAaORQannbzNr 5uYZYHeF3YVuCFM22WVh9dLTK6Yl7cIJQyFBSiaIaLPl+8ix80CrH5Uw3MhaQvN7Wjz 9smPhWm9kuI4YUFNsh3BZ1h6jXIJTON9B+9/ikVgwzpt1AwciQTzp0dLb0iou9pEJpS +7qDoiYXwA==
Received: by smtp.mailfence.com with ESMTPSA ; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------QXiq3ITfjtk7WrcCYM045zvS"
Message-ID: <16daa803-f6f2-e24e-760b-aa8195300cb8@ariskou.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:12:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: fr
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org>
References: <CAP+sJUei2+syMHrgp0NbBetvHV1y7ZtMrG9JY+ZX93Rnob1dwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUetRFig8KJoVrYPVpk9nbSjWDdMS5A89dTQ-D8XGXV3wA@mail.gmail.com> <ee9db401-93aa-72b6-4441-162dd7ffa270@ariskou.com> <CO1PR11MB4881A0E624100FB8EF146790D8A19@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis <aris@ariskou.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4881A0E624100FB8EF146790D8A19@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-ContactOffice-Account: com:113819248
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/jBJj2Uz_KbnLr4aJ2yx12RbnvX8>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 19:12:43 -0000

Hello again,

I went over the changes and your comments and I left comments directly 
in github.

TL;DR: All good on my side, thanks a lot.

Best,
Aris

On 03/06/2022 19:32, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
>
> Hello Aris:
>
> Many thanks again!!!
>
> I pulled your proposed changes and then addressed the comments 
> answering inline. So it you look at
>
> https://github.com/roll-wg/dao-projection/commit/fcb1e78dfec8bcddd11b75ecf7d81cb30452b6f2
>
> you will find my answers next to your comments, and you’ll observe the 
> proposed changes I made.
>
> I published the result to the datatracker so you can observe the diffs 
> as well. Note that you your point on missing SRG column, the SRH is 
> the same as the VIO (in NSM) so it was already there 😊
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-26.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-26
>
> Please let us know if we are good. If we are, all the WGLC comments 
> I’m aware of are now resolved.
>
> Keep safe;
>
> Pascal
>
> *From:* Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis <aris@ariskou.com>
> *Sent:* vendredi 3 juin 2022 4:08
> *To:* roll@ietf.org
> *Cc:* draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have just submitted two pull requests (#17 and #18) in relation to 
> my review of this draft. They should show  up in github.
>
> The first (#17) contains a set of typos and expressions which I fixed 
> as part of reading the draft. It was easier for me directly modify the 
> file and commit it. You should be able to easily pick and choose what 
> to keep, of course.
>
> The second (#18) contains comments on different parts of the draft, 
> and should be self-explanatory.
>
> Overall, the draft, while extensive, is reasonably understandable. 
> Some parts which are not initially clear did clear up by the end of 
> reading it, so no complaints here.
>
> I also proposed some aesthetic improvements to aid in comprehension.
>
> Overall, from my point of view its in a very good state and quite mature.
>
> I await any questions or feedback on the specifics.
>
> Best,
> Aris
>
> On 03/05/2022 17:26, Ines Robles wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     We have not received inputs on this.
>
>     We really need reviews, please consider volunteering for that. If
>     you have any interest but need more time, please let us know
>
>     Thank you very much,
>
>     Ines and Dominique
>
>     On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ines Robles
>     <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) starts today (08th April)
>         until 29th April for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-25.
>
>
>         The draft is available here:
>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/
>
>
>         Please review this draft to see if you think that it is ready
>         for publication and send your comments to the list stating
>         your view.
>
>
>         Thank you very much in advance,
>
>         Ines and Dominique.
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Roll mailing list
>
>     Roll@ietf.org
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>