Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by hop
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 19 October 2012 07:30 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8265721F8584 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8zleNWXj1Jg for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A942E21F8528 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fc26so172778vbb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=u1vYf3ArIG0t3u9lCm/Xnl16p6sk9DCsSvByZfbb5wA=; b=fi0QQhlzEWk/P4lb5twMKUMmHs4WG3/VRdlV3sFY/4jxPMujZaPjSbNMXM7nyCIva6 AJ6mzfI+ItSdJPcxrzML8Bra0UsFR1fFvNwQRTwWxfKgVxjk+BwvUvO29MWqpxhCABB7 x09qqSPwxwWtu5aAwptgASy8N6AV20tK1kQW92hB/jqxVFmJpQhMvaVNNizLMIX+3+re CK/O/dUWblJEGk9+10Ge8OfcZJt+31PPVnhMmPf1MNs7Yx6ljILLIkbem9mwsgiJcF8q Nw+I2U+C9kIf+mL2fQlanmBiSnqNSTorRGW+URjzK4gmaHYH1xQKq+9Sa7xmBDCdzEqH v+Dg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.240.135 with SMTP id la7mr415138vcb.44.1350631854079; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.204.9 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8221CB0DA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8221CB0DA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:30:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88+q3rmqiC5m03gOQv3U-JMo5yjqdOxxjxFEKtUsQahFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by hop
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:30:55 -0000
Hi Pascal, Yes I have totally interest to continue this work, the concept/ideas are greate. I will review and comment when available, I hope we get discussion on list or in f2f meeting, I recommend you to present draft and list it in the f2f ROLL-Agenda, thanking you, AB On 10/18/12, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi > > When I started this draft, we had a series of chats with Brian Carpenter and > apparently reached a gentleman agreement that it was doable within the RPL > domain to use the flow label and avoid the Hop by Hop option. > > I published http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-roll-flow-label-01 > based on that discussion but did not get news from the group since then. > > This technique has a number of advantages, in particular > -it saves extra bytes for the RPL option and the HbH header. > -it also avoids the prescribed tunneling within the RPL domain for packets > from the outside. > - it has an optimized compression with 6LoWPAN. > > Is there interest in the group to continue? If so I'd be glad to have some > discussion time at the next meeting. > > Cheers, > > > > Pascal Thubert > IPv6 Engineering > > pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com> > Phone :+33 497 23 26 34 > Mobile :+33 619 98 29 85 > > > Cisco Systems > Village d'Entreprises Green Side bat. T3 > 400, Avenue Roumanille > 06410 Biot - Sophia Antipolis > France > Cisco.com<http://www.cisco.com/global/FR/> > > [Description: Description: > http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/vertical04.jpg] > > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply > e-mail and delete all copies of this message. > > > >
- [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by hop Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Owen Kirby
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… John E Drake
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… John E Drake
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… John E Drake
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] using the flow label instead of hop by… Philip Levis