IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00

sandy@tislabs.com Wed, 06 November 2002 17:44 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03695 for <rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:44:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6HkJX31464 for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:46:19 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6HkJv31461 for <rpsec-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:46:19 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03671 for <rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:43:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6Hk2v31449; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:46:02 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6HjNv31427 for <rpsec@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:45:23 -0500
Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03649 for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:42:50 -0500 (EST)
From: sandy@tislabs.com
Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id MAA06570; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:45:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from raven.gw.tislabs.com(10.33.1.50) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma006553; Wed, 6 Nov 02 12:44:36 -0500
Received: (from sandy@localhost) by raven.gw.tislabs.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6HiVT19972; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:44:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 12:44:31 -0500
Message-Id: <200211061744.gA6HiVT19972@raven.gw.tislabs.com>
To: rpsec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00
Cc: iljitsch@muada.com
Sender: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

>Also note that the perceived need for more security in BGP can't be all
>that high, as we can tell by the level of MD5 option deployment.

Sadly, "perceived need" has little to do with "actual need".

As we can tell from the level of IPSEC and security deployment compared with
the level of DDoS attacks from compromised or spoofed hosts.

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email