IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com> Wed, 06 November 2002 17:24 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA02899 for <rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:24:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6HQRC29987 for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:26:27 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6HQQv29984 for <rpsec-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:26:26 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA02887 for <rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:23:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6HQDv29954; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:26:13 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6HPDv29912 for <rpsec@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:25:13 -0500
Received: from presque.djinesys.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA02868 for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:22:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by presque.djinesys.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id gA6HOkt13245; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:24:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhaas@jhaas.nexthop.com)
Received: from jhaas.nexthop.com (jhaas.nexthop.com [64.211.218.31]) by presque.djinesys.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gA6HOfC13230; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:24:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhaas@jhaas.nexthop.com)
Received: (from jhaas@localhost) by jhaas.nexthop.com (8.11.3nb1/8.11.3) id gA6HOfo19715; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:24:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 12:24:41 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
To: sandy@tislabs.com
Cc: bgreene@cisco.com, rpsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00
Message-ID: <20021106122441.G18700@nexthop.com>
References: <200211061542.gA6FgfF14354@raven.gw.tislabs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200211061542.gA6FgfF14354@raven.gw.tislabs.com>; from sandy@tislabs.com on Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0500
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Sender: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0500, sandy@tislabs.com wrote:
> Not a surprising development and reminiscent of the auto manufacturers'
> stance on seat belts, crash resistent bumpers, air bags, ...  Those whose
> focus is the bottom line always want to be shown a financial incentive.
> "How about 'survival'?" seems to be unpersuasive.

The usual incentive in that case was laws and lawsuits.
Do we really want to go there?

-- 
Jeff Haas 
NextHop Technologies
_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email