Re: [rrg] Aggregatable EIDs

heinerhummel@aol.com Thu, 07 January 2010 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD9A28C0DF for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:27:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QhhtmYAx6IG for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:27:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-db02.mx.aol.com (imr-db02.mx.aol.com [205.188.91.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618653A67B2 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-db02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o07AQt4v000707; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:26:55 -0500
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id i.ca7.5892e53e (55733); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:26:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtprly-mc03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mc03.mx.aol.com [64.12.95.99]) by cia-md03.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD038-d3d84b45b6e8149; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:26:53 -0500
Received: from magic-m04.mail.aol.com (magic-m04.mail.aol.com [172.21.172.75]) by smtprly-mc03.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMC032-d3d84b45b6e8149; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:26:48 -0500
From: heinerhummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <35f.245e0f8.387710e8@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:26:48 -0500
To: tony.li@tony.li
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_35f.245e0f8.387710e8_boundary"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 95.91.134.11
X-AOL-IP: 172.21.172.75
X-AOL-SENDER: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Aggregatable EIDs
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:27:15 -0000

In einer eMail vom 07.01.2010 08:49:46 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
tony.li@tony.li:

Hi  Heiner,

> Indeed, this is a key point, and I hope you see that   my kind of 
> hierarchy is completely different to all the  others.
> According to TARA there are 64800 hierarchies. On top ( and  not at the 
> bottom) of each of them, there is one particular geopatch  with its 
> internal topology. 


What is the internal topology  of the geopatch?

It is the viewed topology inside a geopatch, acquired by BGP-enhancements,  
consisting of TARA-links i.e. strict links/GRE-tunnels/loose links between  
2 TARA-nodes, whereby the loose links may be built of strict/(less)  
loose/GRE-tunnel links.
 
Heiner