Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal

Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> Wed, 09 March 2016 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB9A12DFDD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MR6QCeS7HtqV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 07:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467E612D785 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 07:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 124so43627421pfg.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:35:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QZRszeLdVecuuifbS9+bWbNiBtUMWoc9USAEPOGxMsI=; b=sHMwrWculKzFt1TJzscYccnyji5ByCRxsjen/Plz1cX5stfSgTtO/xqGv4p63IjUrd Aj2+6fI6Ymfrx1ATr6CpvgGcQAdYB7U6ePDGP7/5uNsOUB5UG0VG0s7Pl1g7pPptvswH hcqAos3IaD76y+52RBjDfb+DTSWjWqa3auDgwSDIaoA3Il1e+HpS6/YdAzaZBD21VyO6 hs32lG40Bgc1cC7aoz5sYSA5xoL74oSLjWjr6qu18Sv+JqG/RclN7fYqG3ylalFlfd5B s7cAy/7Vz56a8G2yWHeJzJsyz2mRNdS5sxTho5CjqIi7NPTuXRyhMKzleVYe4flpiVbP PsFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QZRszeLdVecuuifbS9+bWbNiBtUMWoc9USAEPOGxMsI=; b=PcgT1O/Yh0hkAhOYTFGvkPzhy5sDZUl3nuitPGY7/5gGEDtKJ0WSAqMWyQ0dQ8SRqY pdCS7+kqtFEJzx/cCbeXJsXbGUZO1dLG7lV4FV6DtgNoRDPrjqVqf1UUkLOpzEn1CmTV lE7Qn1s1Z8smaKubgysvi26tFBFoG26OnS41De1FFSvOsrgLiUJ16SHgOSqRHmmrJ18j nxlPWTzYG9esFX7HQB6lhUW3hxfMEhjyGnDFal6vDNuMZr4GOy+AO2aVNLj3NqnBCIXf Ac36UnV9nYJGZei1OPXc1QQVD8wuGiCi4NZmkce8GUlHXTaeWblS+h3Lw3CBEE92iMhf e4sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIqHDvqRX8EK1S/ZM/+CugIvuU2m1IT/3fjqT9bkL3v11TeydNFkDr581RSiPuJPPrf
X-Received: by 10.98.93.205 with SMTP id n74mr50984945pfj.99.1457537748765; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:35:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panoramix.jmvalin.ca ([12.207.17.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ez6sm13330280pab.12.2016.03.09.07.35.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:35:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
References: <CA+9kkMANw8uPLObeGt68Rz+usObeDjQDYp-eQjp=WiCnWPByaQ@mail.gmail.com> <56DDF13F.1050505@mozilla.com> <CA+9kkMA3S2rgts+HRHqoDjzySzfq7w-mi4Ge8e_1b9wD=bEs8g@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB15514F08779F54B3CD74BA34B2B20@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxsJpvGi3rp-AhCibei8vxvJ77cLf_z1b7GuJDzO2mq-Nw@mail.gmail.com> <56DF7C6B.4050400@mozilla.com> <CAD5OKxvLFJh7At0dS8yFP1khcqA09SOA30gd_fKcrsMYvSK2iQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <56E042D2.3090907@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:35:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxvLFJh7At0dS8yFP1khcqA09SOA30gd_fKcrsMYvSK2iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/43kTCOGEaVBvyNCk-zPZDnHGw_g>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:49:26 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/09/2016 10:31 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:


OK, I can live with that and include the text you proposed:

"WebRTC endpoints generated events MUST have duration of no more than
8000 ms and no less than 40 ms with the recommended default duration
of 100 ms for each tone. The gap between events MUST be no less then
30 ms with the recommended default duration of 70 ms."

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW4ELMAAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9PmkH/iRzv1wpu0Q6JwU4xT7Rss51
qLybpByHOqdOZe3nkZtZifZXiuYaROUamuob2hwt6CDi39usl+gEdNc45WRKz0Qj
fwfy9rr0s6AjDA4n9dgYJO7QuZX4b1O8wx9ozvSxBNFuOBZHAMn/7nnLO1WiqHkp
1fUPS6Wln3XE8jW7km2qS6E14ffp+Q9JHVT7cMINaAorY4dY93JCcMRbHhSeuYQB
NYqwmprYBHycPpNi+gXpHwcvnfcoAijObXZZShnclevyNrp3BuslYg89VypgCe8d
Ig/EggHdEgkgJD13SarlX9OSJJ6hkZ2WokPtfoVgwgTxPYCX/o+/AfhvzuD2DQI=
=apR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----