Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60411CDC79 for <rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfc.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYUtyRrcMOHp for <rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9A81CDC70 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u110so108948769qge.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:19:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bkt3/+4tJ6U+0MUTDQSsm8psB5KZMulhOO/IsPb68Ic=; b=kYVxx+mg1dhdRaO25HJqgEWVAkBrFD5SIBPsIKdxuP6phhrbwVg5kxT38cW+kmyb+U 4ymxEiA539S0Dbb/fb13r8XOiTdv5aXsdkwAL5HQ4ovpQumIgyBGoN2Qyj3c3rHg3VwQ fLC7xERlUpTCWrT6G1UbCVx7161jJgv62mxFVYaJCdBWBSOjhoYKy9Hb9PtLSB6nkKny qHUqkdijpNPoZQBT2v4Y2knKnb2h8XjuFMWWv6gOJraVRvO1Tb4TBAcGWdbibwK7+WVh aFdpYAt7khTWjyyyGcMSTJFq3KtuzbzFc9Dqjm94b4O52L2OnX73oZfM1Opt3/rwNp3Z DtOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bkt3/+4tJ6U+0MUTDQSsm8psB5KZMulhOO/IsPb68Ic=; b=S/BbzD3ox6e6X+GbGRBqYtwi3/USHxjMKvk0gf5A8ockTjFs5gdpVVk3a8m2lRu5P9 MBs/pEwPZ3lRxQU7nAV67Q7DnoWxeUeqtY5Zp5N+UJZHYKCJrpPgDd3FNUPXSMhnKUJe TeJhmV+VurSzFtunj58r0L0HuvstBwzwYlt+qkgQKV+xpsTz2dqaZUrqSbHdjxq01SMh u2lEXUB5hlTU3//YwM+m0L1VY5Bl2KRH5mygPSQAqwQcoP9Bo3SbV+AkqyicQGSWGyRV 9Qrxz6ceyBJvsPa0ahDVtEREWl7tAYCQE1fjcXulSA96chev2IbR465X8Qr24EfTNJa8 SedQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIfoM0DvOdIzWj+svv4btwB//QU7OyoOx1x5ctk8BuX2Zhvnt4zoKWoYykR4yqza3dVrsbIUeoE5yzNbQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.235.137 with SMTP id g131mr33710487qhc.43.1457389160297; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:19:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.6.13 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:19:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56DDF13F.1050505@mozilla.com>
References: <CA+9kkMANw8uPLObeGt68Rz+usObeDjQDYp-eQjp=WiCnWPByaQ@mail.gmail.com> <56DDF13F.1050505@mozilla.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:19:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMA3S2rgts+HRHqoDjzySzfq7w-mi4Ge8e_1b9wD=bEs8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135585e32fc33052d7cdbb4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/zonaSxdOCiwpC-QFFWbw29Ai5aQ>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:19:22 -0000
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > As proposed by Roman, I think we should also include the "minimum gap > of 30 ms". Otherwise, I support the proposal. > > Thank you Jean-Marc; I had not thought to include that in my note, but I agree. regards, Ted > Jean-Marc > > On 03/07/2016 03:35 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: > > We've had about 60 or so messages on this topic, and the rough > > consensus seems to be align this document with the limits set out > > in the W3C work here: > > > > https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/#rtcdtmfsender > > > > However, there was also a proposal to slightly modify those limits. > > They are currently: > > > > "The duration cannot be more than 6000 ms or less than 40 ms. The > > default duration is 100 ms for each tone." > > > > Based on Roman's note, a minimum of 40ms and a maximum 8000 ms to > > align with the ITU and RFC2833. > > > > To resolve this, I propose that we ask the WebRTC group to raise > > their max to 8000 and, on receiving a positive response, publish > > this document with 40/8000 as the min and max. If they give a > > negative response, we retain 40/6000. This values alignment > > between the two documents higher than the reference 2833, but that > > seems sensible in this context. > > > > If you have an objection to this way forward, please send your > > reasoning to the list by March 14th. > > > > thanks, > > > > Ted > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing > > list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW3fE5AAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9KDgH/j4bSutkSjUmvt6aTtt26qF6 > FKF2JMkrZc8pjSg6IDTq9MJradJr8WSzr27VSpedWOHHPFf5z4jDn6IpVVMyTUtP > Jj6MvAPTyf9uB7UGq8rfA9y6az9OjChsJZ3j2/yPk7i/bnVYObg0OXOItyPA2+kA > 7KCJAIWUiIBdfifKV8W1qre5DbUVi4iXnGIzbQ5KJIpxrO3Cxrq+vlPy7Gznc1a1 > o4B50DU6p3nBILGgCXpFwAMW5PBfco/oAOzCH90gqcM8hzEROW50LTJED/OP0K/b > S3LMG3M+BriuAaslwW/Tj0qm3VUqtFpKaE3I0zjlxUbvfsxg/JYju2ebGSslZ7I= > =dpJA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
- [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Mark Harris
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal Roman Shpount