Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

As proposed by Roman, I think we should also include the "minimum gap
of 30 ms". Otherwise, I support the proposal.

	Jean-Marc

On 03/07/2016 03:35 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> We've had about 60 or so messages on this topic, and the rough
> consensus seems to be align this document with the limits set out
> in the W3C work here:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/#rtcdtmfsender
> 
> However, there was also a proposal to slightly modify those limits.
>  They are currently:
> 
> "The duration cannot be more than 6000 ms or less than 40 ms. The 
> default duration is 100 ms for each tone."
> 
> Based on Roman's note, a minimum of 40ms and a maximum 8000 ms to
> align with the ITU and RFC2833.
> 
> To resolve this, I propose that we ask the WebRTC group to raise
> their max to 8000 and, on receiving a positive response, publish
> this document with 40/8000 as the min and max.  If they give a
> negative response, we retain 40/6000.  This values alignment
> between the two documents higher than the reference 2833, but that
> seems sensible in this context.
> 
> If you have an objection to this way forward, please send your
> reasoning to the list by March 14th.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing
> list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW3fE5AAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9KDgH/j4bSutkSjUmvt6aTtt26qF6
FKF2JMkrZc8pjSg6IDTq9MJradJr8WSzr27VSpedWOHHPFf5z4jDn6IpVVMyTUtP
Jj6MvAPTyf9uB7UGq8rfA9y6az9OjChsJZ3j2/yPk7i/bnVYObg0OXOItyPA2+kA
7KCJAIWUiIBdfifKV8W1qre5DbUVi4iXnGIzbQ5KJIpxrO3Cxrq+vlPy7Gznc1a1
o4B50DU6p3nBILGgCXpFwAMW5PBfco/oAOzCH90gqcM8hzEROW50LTJED/OP0K/b
S3LMG3M+BriuAaslwW/Tj0qm3VUqtFpKaE3I0zjlxUbvfsxg/JYju2ebGSslZ7I=
=dpJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----