Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal

"Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D2912D505 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:41:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sonusnetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id betF0DKNWUSW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:41:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD9712D501 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:41:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SonusNetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-sonusnet-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=zOjAqkA3JXMdhgCXexw5a/ciSlAucLb50GgndvH59Ac=; b=X0hnjokYlbRz4TrJ0/F6efSYnde9gDAFU7940lF6mWOkuxFv3EwzXLnnQpQgJJ66WXauwgTpfd+ihM40o6nczW5HwwGcUqWXnz15ygwPhGOzfKUJOqt6PssgJ8SC2MsgU4M5ExV5XGTMVIa68AuQcm+prfbglFMrklsPNe4U7B0=
Received: from SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.129.157) by SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.129.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.427.16; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:24:48 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.129.157]) by SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.129.157]) with mapi id 15.01.0427.019; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:24:48 +0000
From: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal
Thread-Index: AQHReLEGZXQ6ENs53U20okwQmfoJbJ9OfbeAgAAPmQCAAJd7oA==
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:24:48 +0000
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB15514F08779F54B3CD74BA34B2B20@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+9kkMANw8uPLObeGt68Rz+usObeDjQDYp-eQjp=WiCnWPByaQ@mail.gmail.com> <56DDF13F.1050505@mozilla.com> <CA+9kkMA3S2rgts+HRHqoDjzySzfq7w-mi4Ge8e_1b9wD=bEs8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA3S2rgts+HRHqoDjzySzfq7w-mi4Ge8e_1b9wD=bEs8g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=sonusnet.com;
x-originating-ip: [73.29.18.75]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a35b335e-07e1-4e5f-878a-08d34722bb2a
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB1551; 5:RPwXzXz1uqd4a01u8nybr4kSYx+4dVFUI8Meqjz8WYdgU8hbBCkMKrWKZZ7GZcLfzMtTcnO4EfR3Jasxa2xw8X/MoRLtQybv+3KrqcuUafZBa/+B9M4l0H1vJgSR5SQ9I8GS2MeM5uC4aQqgHVjI9Q==; 24:658GTB4Yf+0Idmn0nw999wx0Ww69sPC+SXbdK/JMhWRvhlMuK5TEc/IaXP9USmvUVif9wuk3ZbMWKHCRoh0RcIp6GexI4NA8gA2a/ac9tO4=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1551;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0301MB1551F149D6B5540575287BE3B2B20@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1551; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1551;
x-forefront-prvs: 08756AC3C8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(377454003)(479174004)(24454002)(164054003)(575784001)(86362001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(11100500001)(5008740100001)(106116001)(33656002)(561944003)(2950100001)(19625215002)(66066001)(77096005)(2900100001)(92566002)(122556002)(15975445007)(16236675004)(19609705001)(81166005)(19617315012)(5004730100002)(5001770100001)(87936001)(1096002)(3846002)(3280700002)(6116002)(1220700001)(102836003)(790700001)(3660700001)(586003)(76576001)(4326007)(2906002)(19300405004)(74316001)(54356999)(5002640100001)(40100003)(50986999)(10400500002)(5003600100002)(76176999)(189998001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1551; H:SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN1PR0301MB15514F08779F54B3CD74BA34B2B20SN1PR0301MB1551_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Mar 2016 07:24:48.2239 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB1551
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/T4sMtAljx_6GOkOAg33iUj0dgwQ>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:41:42 -0000

Would the text be crafted so that it pertains *only* to the RFC4733 digit packets emitted by a browser?

Information about gap between retransmission of the final packet could be useful as well and I suggest 20ms for that one.

Thanks,
Tolga

From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Hardie
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 5:19 PM
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTMF resolution proposal

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com<mailto:jmvalin@mozilla.com>> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

As proposed by Roman, I think we should also include the "minimum gap
of 30 ms". Otherwise, I support the proposal.

Thank you Jean-Marc; I had not thought to include that in my note, but I agree.
regards,
Ted


        Jean-Marc

On 03/07/2016 03:35 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> We've had about 60 or so messages on this topic, and the rough
> consensus seems to be align this document with the limits set out
> in the W3C work here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/#rtcdtmfsender
>
> However, there was also a proposal to slightly modify those limits.
>  They are currently:
>
> "The duration cannot be more than 6000 ms or less than 40 ms. The
> default duration is 100 ms for each tone."
>
> Based on Roman's note, a minimum of 40ms and a maximum 8000 ms to
> align with the ITU and RFC2833.
>
> To resolve this, I propose that we ask the WebRTC group to raise
> their max to 8000 and, on receiving a positive response, publish
> this document with 40/8000 as the min and max.  If they give a
> negative response, we retain 40/6000.  This values alignment
> between the two documents higher than the reference 2833, but that
> seems sensible in this context.
>
> If you have an objection to this way forward, please send your
> reasoning to the list by March 14th.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing
> list rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW3fE5AAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9KDgH/j4bSutkSjUmvt6aTtt26qF6
FKF2JMkrZc8pjSg6IDTq9MJradJr8WSzr27VSpedWOHHPFf5z4jDn6IpVVMyTUtP
Jj6MvAPTyf9uB7UGq8rfA9y6az9OjChsJZ3j2/yPk7i/bnVYObg0OXOItyPA2+kA
7KCJAIWUiIBdfifKV8W1qre5DbUVi4iXnGIzbQ5KJIpxrO3Cxrq+vlPy7Gznc1a1
o4B50DU6p3nBILGgCXpFwAMW5PBfco/oAOzCH90gqcM8hzEROW50LTJED/OP0K/b
S3LMG3M+BriuAaslwW/Tj0qm3VUqtFpKaE3I0zjlxUbvfsxg/JYju2ebGSslZ7I=
=dpJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----