Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Randell Jesup <> Thu, 21 November 2013 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7B51AE2FE for <>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:37:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtG-ITvmjDlc for <>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:37:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5221AE2F4 for <>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:37:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]:1210 helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <>) id 1Vjazp-000AT0-9Z for; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:37:05 -0600
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:35:43 -0500
From: Randell Jesup <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: authenticated_id:
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:37:14 -0000

On 11/21/2013 1:14 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> If there are any people in that category that wish to vote, could they email the chairs with full name and affiliation. That would make it easier to figure out how to deal with this issue. I think it will be hard to take votes from someone that will not provide the information required to be on a blue sheet due to questions about double counting.

I think anyone who certifies they participated in one or more of the 
IETF rtcweb meetings via jabber should be allowed to vote, so long as 
they give their name and affiliation, and which meeting they 
participated in.  The list of people who vote in this manner should 
perhaps be made public, but I'm not sure that's needed barring any 
belief by the chairs someone is trying to game the system.

It does point out a weakness in the IETF jabber participation 
mechanisms; we should have a "virtual bluesheet" for jabber attendees.

Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com