IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Thu, 21 November 2013 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061861AE05C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:19:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfzLvLa7OwQD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:19:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.IN.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52D91AE207 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (p54973753.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.151.55.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id rALJJ0VM020467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:19:02 +0100
Message-ID: <528E5CA0.8080007@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:18:56 +0100
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com> <827DC810-21FD-494D-9E44-6C7406887464@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <827DC810-21FD-494D-9E44-6C7406887464@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:19:13 -0000

> If there are any people in that category that wish to vote, could they email the chairs with full name and affiliation. That would make it easier to figure out how to deal with this issue. I think it will be hard to take votes from someone that will not provide the information required to be on a blue sheet due to questions about double counting.

There is an issue with the jabber logs: they only record room nicknames, 
not the full JID. So there is no way to tell who that "stpeter" or "EKR" 
guy really is.

That is certainly something that needs to be improved in the future.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email