Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8CE1AE06D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pPZopIkD0o_v for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE2B1AE04F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so389129wgh.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tn5qf+PXMGzbxwCVdrrJ0udBFp6rRmGemx5u+l/w+ZA=; b=JVGzWmtxvO0So5bG/iMJ0SXPSPI8idtz9KUdgI5KwGQT2iR2RtaszXGqQWTHqHq/M5 b40+dSW11K3K3fhxcL2h3hU2bmnLDRLjqM3pyCFdflQgpFpqJ/DpjENpVKpNP8gSYV5J qTM3t+F4MVC6P1gdpbZUrrFJ3Vz4chREaHqop3wzlww6uH+Z11ycr18am7z2BfHCa/kl u/aVyckcSaRXzTqIPe1bTSrUYCxlfa9upwbuZ5gse/6A0uqjoSAroQIxYe8JqDMNzg0t VnYZALScW70pf+R0flR9y40cHN2kvAhc1WMFXyBh5EKMab+ZkxVhHPFGNIHLUhGhQQp3 mjmQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.86.102 with SMTP id o6mr7860503wiz.30.1385072540601; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3249225E-6709-4022-88CF-75020C1A4CEC@iii.ca>
References: <528E69E2.9020208@librevideo.org> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7E0@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <CAOJ7v-151K2UoeMOhY-UUDzZwE=89qzbAQdrhQXYb72W+ZxQOw@mail.gmail.com> <3249225E-6709-4022-88CF-75020C1A4CEC@iii.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:22:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVdQJyjvNOoN7-NRsP0c=tOH3EwcnixrVa4pKQmTvgxjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:22:30 -0000

On 21 November 2013 14:14, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:
> I'll note that some people strongly disagree with this is not a technical decision but there are others who do think it is is no longer a technical decision.

Is that a chair statement declaring lack of consensus on whether the
MTI video codec debate has a technical basis?