Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 21 November 2013 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31901AE204 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:59:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWUzQRtlNIHd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68D31AE1FE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.32.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MOCSm-1VmsSC1dxs-005aH5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:59:04 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:59:05 +0100
Message-ID: <hshs89d8rv4ju4u9kr98hb8us23ve72ol1@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2REjMrmnl2obEjPJF/urQfSwYYdOH5ZYNTt/07oNlex53iZuiAl zZ55Pl5oJDEdujuJl/uNuQ05N28sIo+apg9P9OASeJEdyOYSVVhiBRcZPrZjyzOx3fElGTS /DJR6Sm4Ip6zRIX8yBPRop4QismyXBHPWhiSj6LQz3RPF5M+abmcqmnKGLj9IZmsHoPBGw7 VMokvGTRZfqdwAhLocFOw==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:59:16 -0000

* Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>Balloting:
> - The voter MUST rank ALL alternatives in their ballot from the most
>   preferred, marked with rank 1, the second most with 2, all the way
>   to the least preferred marked with rank N.
>
>4) When the voting period is over the ballot collector will publish the
>results as well as all ballots, including the voters name to the RTCWEB
>WG mailing list. This enables all voting individuals to verify that
>their ballot is unmodified. And allows anyone to verify the result of
>the vote.
>
>5) The selection is recorded in the drafts.
>
>--- End of Process Proposal ---

I think this needs to say how invalid ballots are handled. It seems easy
to assign the same rank twice, for instance.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/