Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for synchronization
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 20:08 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB16921F842E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:08:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.160, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xAeJRGQd3rD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:08:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4DC21F843D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:08:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2767; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360267731; x=1361477331; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gimFm9FoMsH3f9LicgQFOLH7IsPpklvw7gn4MRJ+/Vw=; b=hJlOUj9TQdcInoU+Id62lZTvxw/XV+am4gounHpleG3RdpgA53BiOrHr XJT/s0GGJ1r+RxPnouz0nBmZHhGhBOuk3no+LlwB9ktJTEoIIdUT4z7Y3 KpSfLF0xGCpD+VunnpAN5AVF+6qhx53QHUnUOxQzyhBMtzLRFUJQkVYkJ U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAOgIFFGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABFwGoWc4IfAQEBBAEBATc0CwwEAgEIDgMEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIiAkMv3YEkHthA6ZzgwCCJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,623,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="171620432"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2013 20:08:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r17K8oon013577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:08:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.180]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:08:50 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for synchronization
Thread-Index: AQHOBWibViPecFs2mkCye+0PXdv32phvLDUAgAAERYCAAASbAIAAAQsA//+byrA=
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:08:49 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882804788D71@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
References: <CABcZeBO105HXWoRAbaAR0fGTCLtDmAyjt-DOM=aKy80sg2SG_Q@mail.gmail.com> <51140038.3040001@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBP_-ce-JT-oDkpkDoRKjrZo+m7NLTcifCOsRBM_qKPTmg@mail.gmail.com> <511407AA.1040501@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBO0oSYw-M-1wVujftiYdBtJ67SBfMp4k5gSm45HFhZ+=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO0oSYw-M-1wVujftiYdBtJ67SBfMp4k5gSm45HFhZ+=A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.125.114]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for synchronization
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:08:52 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Eric Rescorla > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:03 PM > To: Stefan Hakansson LK > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for > synchronization > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > On 02/07/2013 08:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > > > My question is basically: what if the sender creates two > MediaStreams for which all tracks have local sources > (cam's, > mike's), sends them to a peer, will the RTP streams for > both > MediaStreams have the same or different CNAME? > > I argued for that they should have the same. > > > Yes, I think this is a separate (and fraught) question. :) > > > > Separate question, but I think the answer should be documented > (regardless on if it is "same", "different" or "implementers choice"). > > > > Agreed. I think SHOULD is the correct thing to document. I can imagine there will be cases in which the sender will be a somewhat distributed app that does not really know that the media source should be synchronized, so it will assign a different CNAME. The rest of the proposal sounded good as well. Cheers, Charles > -Ekr > > > > -Ekr > > > 4. There are two ways for MSID and CNAME to be > inconsistent. > - If MSID indicates synchronization but different CNAMEs > are > provided, > synchronization is not attempted. > - If MSID indicates no synchronization but the same > CNAME is used, > then the tracks shall be synchronized, even though > they > appear in > different MediaStreams. > > -Ekr > > > > > _________________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtcweb > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtcweb> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb> > > > > _________________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtcweb > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtcweb> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb> > > > > > >
- [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSI… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and… Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] Simulcast was Re: Proposal for dealing w… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Simulcast was Re: Proposal for deali… Timothy B. Terriberry