Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-10-31 04:30, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2011/10/30 6:11, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> Hi,
>> being in the process of scanning all the drafts with -rtcweb- in them, I
>> came across these two:
>>
>> draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-00.txt
>> draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-turn-uri-00.txt
>>
>> Just three comments:
>>
>> - I think it's not RTCWEB business. They should be pointed at the home
>> group for STUN/ICE.

Well, I think this boils down to an RTCWEB WG requirement to the W3C
saying something like:

The API must enable the application to configure the WebRTC stack with
one or more STUN or TURN resources. This configuration will need to
include security credentials for using those resources.

>From my perspective I think it is W3C that needs to consider if they
want to use an URI format, or have tuple providing host name/address,
transport, security, and security credentials.

> 
> For TURN, there's already
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uri-bis-04.

I also think the draft authors should take RFC 5928 into account here.
That document defines how DNS can be used to resolve TURN resources
using S-NAPTR.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------