IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Sun, 06 November 2011 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7438B21F8514; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:45:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nM9kQrsNZM4d; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE02C21F8509; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so3849591vcb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 08:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.65.16 with SMTP id g16mr1729414vci.68.1320597922063; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 08:45:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.206 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:45:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EB6B904.8050607@alvestrand.no>
References: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no> <CALiegf=f4kFzyDLWK+Y5vbuCEJFXX590+VuZ4bbnHZnvX0CoBA@mail.gmail.com> <4EAC8AE0.3020307@acm.org> <4EACD558.1050003@alvestrand.no> <4EAE157F.5020901@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EAEB76B.9090304@acm.org> <8B0C4061-D362-4DFE-9677-7E64515A6E1C@network-heretics.com> <4EAF9391.5040209@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EB05A23.3060101@alvestrand.no> <01O80L7NM7N000RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABcZeBPCGcUcEDNJ5T3+LowrdTz-NAka3Q33CA8mvdwb0=+aZg@mail.gmail.com> <4EB480E7.1010200@alvestrand.no> <01O823CUB1SG00XBUL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4EB6B904.8050607@alvestrand.no>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:45:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegf=XyHCT7G-RBYwS_AR58pmm7MYUs0HW23rsuqZ9WTUyhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:45:23 -0000

2011/11/6 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>:
> I was thinking
>
>   turn://<user>@<host>?proto=<udp, tcp or tls>
>
> but thought that this was going too far into details.

Is not more appropriate to use "transport" rather than "proto"?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email