Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-04: Some comments on Section 5.2.1. and 5.2.2 (19th september)

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

I really hope BUNDLE will be used as described in BUNDLE. At least that should be our starting point. If we want to change something, it shall be justified and discussed, before put into a document.

In addition, in the example flow in JSEP, BUNDLE IS used with different addresses, so an alignment will be needed in any case.

Regards,

Christer

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Harald Alvestrand
Sent: 20. syyskuuta 2013 13:12
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-04: Some comments on Section 5.2.1. and 5.2.2 (19th september)

On 09/20/2013 10:27 AM, Kevin Dempsey wrote:

Q_4:      BUNDLE

The text says:

"If a m= section is not being bundled into another m= section, it MUST
                generate a unique set of ICE credentials and gather its own set of
                candidates.  Otherwise, it MUST use the same ICE credentials and
                candidates that were used in the m= section that it is being bundled
                into."

As, when BUNDLE is used, the initial Offer will contain identical ICE candidates, does that mean that we will also include identical address information in the initial Offer?

I don't object to that - I just want to clarify, as it has impacts on the text in the BUNDLE spec :)


I think we should be careful here to specify that BUNDLE is used according to the BUNDLE spec, and that any description given here is non-normative.

Over to MMUSIC....