Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Proposed Agenda for Interim

On 1/2/13 2:44 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Cullen said:
>
> "3) if we are going to have an MMUSIC face to face interim meeting, it 
> would need AD approval and 4 weeks notices which puts us very close do 
> the deadline so this needs to get sort out real soon. "
>
> [BA] I see no particularly good reason why this can't  happen 
> quickly.  In fact, why not schedule two MMUSIC interims, 4-6 weeks 
> apart from each other?  If travel is an issue, they can be virtual.  
> EKR's issue list is a fine starting point, and there is an informal 
> IESG telechat tomorrow (3-Jan) as well as one on 10-Jan-2013.
>
> Ted's suggestion (to cover this in the RTCWEB interim) might do in a 
> pinch, but really, MMUSIC WG has to develop a sense of urgency on 
> this.  If things keep going as they have, by the time we get published 
> RFCs out of MMUSIC,  implementations will have been in the field for 
> years.
>
The MMUSIC WG is driven by the contributions, discussions, and 
ultimately rough consensus of its participants, just like any other WG. 
The active participants on the topics of interest here seem to be 
largely the same in the two groups, so I'm not sure exactly what you are 
looking for or proposing here, but constructive suggestions are always 
welcome.

Thanks

-- Flemming (MMUSIC co-chair)


> If MMUSIC were a Hollywood Celebrity, we'd be *way* past the time for 
> "tough love" and on the front page of the National Enquirer for the 
> Nth time.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic