[rtcweb] Proposed Agenda for Interim

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

Chairs,

I've spent some time thinking about the agenda for the interim, and
thought it might be helpful if I sent you a strawman based on the
items that are blocking progress in terms of implementation and
interoperability.

Note:
I am assuming 4 hours each day. The times have been selected with
the objective of giving us enough time to really resolve the
open issues. Honestly, we might even add more time for
the issues on day 1.

Hope this is helpful.

Day 1
2:00    Bundle   [Holmberg]
Objective: select an approach and work out enough
 details that the editors can work to produce a
suitable draft.

 Drafts:
- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-one-rtp
- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-mmt-negotiation


2:00    Multiple flow SDP representation [Jennings, Alvestrand]
Objective: decide on an architecture for large numbers
 of similar streams (e.g., multiple video streams).

Drafts:
 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid
- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-mmusic-msid
 - Do we have a "master" document for the single m-line case?
- Multiple m-lines doesn't have a document


Day 2
1:30    Mapping stream/track label concepts SDP identifiers [Alvestrand]
Objective: determine requirements
 1:30    Trickle ICE open issues [Ivov(?), Uberti, Rescorla]
 - Starting checks
- Termination conditions
- Error handling
 Drafts:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle

1:00    SDP for Datachannels open issues [Jesup, Loreto]
Objective: resolve open issues (post WGLC?)

Drafts:
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-02

Day 3
1:00    Other recommended audio codecs [Roach]
 Objective: identify what other audio codecs we intend to
 recommend.

1:00    Process WGLC comments on documents [authors]

0:30    Other business

0:30    Wrapup/next steps [Chairs]


Best,
-Ekr