Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Proposed Agenda for Interim

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

(cutting back to RTCWEB)

On 01/02/2013 07:18 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> I'm not really sure what to do here - given a key role of the chairs is largely to facilitate the discussions and meetings that Wg participants want to have,  guidance from participants of both MMUSIC and rtcweb is really important here.
I have to disagree on principle - the role of the chairs is to drive the 
WG to complete its charter.
So the chairs have to set the agenda that allows us to make the maximum 
progress towards completing the charter; this is not a debating society.
The chairs serve at the pleasure of the AD, not the WG.
>
> I agree that
>
> 1) the items in EKR's email do look like the a bunch of the high runner items that need to be resolved soon
>
> 2) the solutions of these problems are likely in to be mostly MMUSIC though, as Ted has pointed out, some amount of the requirements, architecture and other discussion can happen in rtcweb.
>
> 3) if we are going to have an MMUSIC face to face interim meeting, it would need AD approval and 4 weeks notices which puts us very close do the deadline so this needs to get sort out real soon.
I think that due to the inaction on this topic in MMUSIC, this ship (for 
physical interims) has sailed.
RTCWEB needs to make its plans for completing its charter accordingly.