Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Proposed Agenda for Interim

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote:

>
> 2) the solutions of these problems are likely in to be mostly MMUSIC
> though, as Ted has pointed out, some amount of the requirements,
> architecture and other discussion can happen in rtcweb.
>
>
I actually believe it can go beyond requirements and architecture; I
believe that if RTCWEB can come to a firm understanding of what solutions
are best for its use cases, it can communicate that to MMUSIC.  That
doesn't mean the final decision doesn't rest with MMUSIC--it does--but it
does mean that RTCWEB doesn't have to leave the technology discussion
completely off the table.  A good analysis can go to MMUSIC for discussion
and potential resolution in/by Orlando.

3) if we are going to have an MMUSIC face to face interim meeting, it would
> need AD approval and 4 weeks notices which puts us very close do the
> deadline so this needs to get sort out real soon.
>
>
There is also the option of a virtual interim, which is (somewhat) less of
a logistical issue.

Ted

> Cullen
>
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is a good agenda - for an MMUSIC WG interim (only day 3 has any
> RTCWEB items on it).
> >
> > Since there is a notice requirement, can we get MMUSIC on board so the
> interim can actually take place?
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:13, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Chairs,
> >>
> >> I've spent some time thinking about the agenda for the interim, and
> >> thought it might be helpful if I sent you a strawman based on the
> >> items that are blocking progress in terms of implementation and
> >> interoperability.
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> I am assuming 4 hours each day. The times have been selected with
> >> the objective of giving us enough time to really resolve the
> >> open issues. Honestly, we might even add more time for
> >> the issues on day 1.
> >>
> >> Hope this is helpful.
> >>
> >> Day 1
> >> 2:00    Bundle   [Holmberg]
> >>      Objective: select an approach and work out enough
> >>      details that the editors can work to produce a
> >>      suitable draft.
> >>
> >>      Drafts:
> >>      -
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
> >>      - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-one-rtp
> >>      -
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-mmt-negotiation
> >>
> >>
> >> 2:00    Multiple flow SDP representation [Jennings, Alvestrand]
> >>      Objective: decide on an architecture for large numbers
> >>      of similar streams (e.g., multiple video streams).
> >>
> >>      Drafts:
> >>      - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid
> >>      - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-mmusic-msid
> >>      - Do we have a "master" document for the single m-line case?
> >>      - Multiple m-lines doesn't have a document
> >>
> >>
> >> Day 2
> >> 1:30    Mapping stream/track label concepts SDP identifiers [Alvestrand]
> >>      Objective: determine requirements
> >>
> >>
> >> 1:30    Trickle ICE open issues [Ivov(?), Uberti, Rescorla]
> >>
> >>      - Starting checks
> >>      - Termination conditions
> >>      - Error handling
> >>
> >>      Drafts:
> >>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle
> >>
> >> 1:00    SDP for Datachannels open issues [Jesup, Loreto]
> >>      Objective: resolve open issues (post WGLC?)
> >>
> >>      Drafts:
> >>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-02
> >>
> >> Day 3
> >> 1:00    Other recommended audio codecs [Roach]
> >>
> >>      Objective: identify what other audio codecs we intend to
> >>      recommend.
> >>
> >> 1:00    Process WGLC comments on documents [authors]
> >>
> >> 0:30    Other business
> >>
> >> 0:30    Wrapup/next steps [Chairs]
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> -Ekr
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > <Mail Attachment.txt>_______________________________________________
> > mmusic mailing list
> > mmusic@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>