Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 21 November 2013 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996FE1AE23B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:21:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2d_DT7PNqdW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D788D1AE244 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:21:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.32.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MSY2q-1W8p0B0WBw-00RYiX for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:21:07 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:21:08 +0100
Message-ID: <5ijs89h7ukib0rnvs7oqq522m7spa92g93@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <hshs89d8rv4ju4u9kr98hb8us23ve72ol1@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <B7461ABB-DC64-43B9-8749-FB2FF3DEBB0E@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <B7461ABB-DC64-43B9-8749-FB2FF3DEBB0E@iii.ca>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1nRK0lmdGQZ92tidPDEXH0SVaGcv3Pq5WKelqsr8nWMXqTCT7SX WrGCTC2Vao/1hxZT5ex9RsIcJvxJxs90LHEKQmMEArhy/DHM3qtYwrT1RO0N5UgBGLTA6HA vi2ZuG/l2Z9uDaVPZNya7Q4DEZA6zub/GS4wK/MzcBdXTbBhWBTjKIFi75t+2fS4yYNYArn CV3ZmJVmB/LBoAVAELiTg==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:21:23 -0000

* Cullen Jennings wrote:
>On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>; wrote:
>> I think this needs to say how invalid ballots are handled. It seems easy
>> to assign the same rank twice, for instance.
>
>Good point - would you be OK if the  vote collector notices a problem, 
>they can email the voter and see if they want to correct it, but any 
>invalid ballots that are not correct by the end of voting period will be 
>discarded ?

That would be acceptable.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/